On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:34:57 GMT, james wrote
in :

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:21:21 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

+I can think of many who have ideas on this, but only a few here could
+pass the security clearance and have the ("desired" even if the ad
+doesn't say it) military background and extensive expertise in a related
+field. How about it, Frank? JimH? Feds need folks who are in touch with
+reality when it comes to anything to do with spectum and frequency
+management. Perhaps that would disqualify you both.
*****

Actually that is one of the lower security clearances and is not that
difficult to get and maintain. IF you have no criminal background, no
membership in subversive organizations and not in severe debt, then
this clearance is easy to get.


Unless the system has changed in the past 20 years, there are three
levels of security clearance: 'confidential', 'secret' and 'top
secret'. It is -not- "one of the lower security clearances", and it is
-not- easy to get.







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----