an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
From you own tale of your experience with trying to learn morse, you'd
be 1) incapable of recognizing that it was an emergency and 2) incapable
of understanding what help was needed.
more of your pack of lies
Nope.
From the archived words of Mark C. Morgan, KB9RQZ.
YOU said you COULDN'T DO IT.
Nope I said I can't when restricted to just the use of my ear
Ear...fingers...flashing lights.
You're incapable. Period.
Unless, of course, you're now changing your story and claiming you
CAN learn Morse?
nope No need to learn Morse in order to use morse
Even Jim adknowledges that
Regardless of the mehtodology, YOU won't learn...
You refuse to acept facts
You refuse to use a spellchecker.
yes I do
That makes you a voluntary idiot.
It isn't hard to reconize SoS
It is if you don't know Morse Code.
a few letter sure can't keep the whole set in my mind though
Perhaps the lack of "mind" with which to store the 26 letters and
10 numbers?
Once reconized the action needed is clear, For me of course the
procedure is different I would record the signal for play back later.
Then I try ruing it though a computer decode, which should recover much
of the signal. or if not I send using the PC a sginal reequesting more
data...(SNIP)
If you can't copy code without the computer, how are you going to
send it?
By using the computer to do so
How do you know to record one signal over another that MIGHT be a
distress signal?
I have done so many times
I bet you have.
Indeed a FD station where I was doing so may even be in Your log
Not in my log it isn't.
I run it through until I have or find I can't read it with a
machine. If i can't read it then I start calling people who can read
the signal play it for them let them decode it and/or get them on the
Air to render more assistance than I can
And by the time this has all transpired and you've spent a couple
hours banging out your dreck in RRAP due to your frustrations at not
knowing if it was a distress signal or Dave and I talking about you,
the ship has gone down with loss of life. Too bad, too...There was a
tanker only 10 miles away that could have diverted and assisted...
wel you yea sure it would take me longer, never diened that and yea if
the ship is sinking fast I may not be able to help, butAt least I tried
"well" "denied" "yeah"
"Gee too bad the ship sank and I COULD have saved them".
So your satement "From you own tale of your experience with trying to
learn morse, you'd be 1) incapable of recognizing that it was an
emergency and 2) incapable of understanding what help was needed.", Is
a bald faced lie,and if you had any brains you'd know that.
He does have the brains. He very aptly pointed out that you have
not learned Morse Code and as a consequence can not respond in a prompt
and meaningful manner.
dpends on how well the morse was send if the operator was good I can
turn it around in acouple of minutes if it is bad then maybe an hour
"depends" "sent"
It won't matter HOW fast it's sent...If you can't do it, you can't
do it.
But I could respond in seconds tell them someone was trying to decode
and tell em things to do in sending there signal that would help my PC
to copy
How can you send a message in response TO a message and tell them
you're trying to "decode" it when you don't even know why the original
message was sent...?!?!
the word you refuse to say, the answer to the question of when you
worked those out of band hams did you know they were out of band or
not. Not were you responible to know or any other evasion.
Why, Mark, is that an "evasion"...?!?!
It remains the point. He wasn't required to know.
it was never the point
Sure it was.
Was he required to know the OTHER station's operating limits, and
WAS he, by his Tanzanian license, restricted from communicating with
them.
It's the WHOLE point!
you dance and dance avoiding this question
In either case, he's "in the clear".
Dave had NO OBLIGATION to know who was in or out of the bands per
THIER administration's requiremments.
None under US law...None under Tanzanian law...None under
International law.
more evasion
It's not "evasion".
It's a matter or complying with laws and regulations.
A question even YOU said was moot!
Which means YOU haven't got a leg to stand on.
the longer you 2 dance around missing the point the better it gets
There's no "dancing".
YOU have acknowledged that Dave wasn't required to know the French
stations limits.
YOU have acknowledged that no one could be EXPECTED to know other
stations limits...
Yet YOU keep trying tio insist that it somehow applies differently
in this case...
Which just makes YOU look (as if it were possible) even MORE
idiotitc.
Steve, K4YZ
|