K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
John Smith wrote:
AOF:
Look at your past posts, and those exchanging with you. All you are doing
is defending your self against an attack or forced into a counterattack
on someone attacking you. You have been effectively side-lined, removed
from the real game of constructive comments, ideas and exchanges on
amateur policy and future. If that isn't a plan to stop progress, it
still effectively functions as such and by past example here, it does seem
quite effective.
Not realy I am partciating in threads with Dee about the future
The thread with Dave and DX while rather acrimonious is on target as
the ARS, being over what Is and isn't Good Ham practice
A subject of which you have no obvious experience in.
Gee I have received no NAL from the FCC, that meats so standard of
Proof in other areas
The thread could be better of course but.. i can only work with what I
am given
And there it is...
"...i can only work with what I am given..."
Indeed with 2 people bent on avoiding answering a simple question I
can't do much
GimmeGimmeGimme.....
Uh huh...Nothing new there...
Steve, K4YZ
|