RadioBanter - View Single Post - here is an issue, Operating and the Rules

August 18th 05, 11:01 AM

wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Wed, Aug 17 2005 4:01 pm

wrote:
From: John Smith on Wed 17 Aug 2005 09:06

The fcc has an avenue where ideas for change, restructuring and progress
can be introduced.

Er, John, the FCC is the ONLY avenue to travel.

Poor Lennie.

I'm not "poor," little Stebie, rather reasonably well-off,
NO liens at all, wife and I just bought a new car, we both
have income other than Social Security. We own two houses,
one in Los Angeles, the other in Kitsap County, WA...no
mortgages on either.

Sure you are.

Oh, I am sure you have the material things you claim, but that's
ALL you have.

You're a proven liar, a miscreant who's word is worthless.

So congratulations on your wise financial investments. Because
your "word" wouldn't buy you a cup of coffee in a free soup kitchen.

Can't stand it that there ARE other avenues "where ideas for
change, restructuring and progress" may be "introduced".

Incorrect. There are MANY avenues for change, restructuring
and progress. For civilian radio there is ONLY ONE and that
ONE is the Federal Communications Commission for U.S.
citizens.

Your "incorrect" is untrue.

That there are discussions in THIS forum for those very issues
disproves your assertion.

SNIP

Amateur radio regulations were NOT a topic of discussions
at a neighborhood meeting of our City Councilwoman two
weeks ago at the All-Saints Church parish hall.

Why shoud they be? Why COULDN'T they be?

But does that make "untrue" my claim that there ARE other avenues
for change of Amateur regulations?

That it eventually winds up in the FCC's lap is a certainty, but
is it your contention that the FCC's NPRM/R&O is the ONLY forum for
those changes?

They won't be at Congressman Brad Sherman's Town Meeting next
week in Northridge, CA. Do you think amateur radio regs
SHOULD be discussed there? If so, state WHY.

Why not?

Is Congressman Sherman NOT elected for the purpose of representing
your issues and concerns to the government? Is there some list of
topics somewhere that says you can't discuss federal regulations with
your elected representitive in a public forum?

Means he can't remind us of how impotent he is.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not to worry, LITTLE Stebie, in a real discussion of real
issues affecting the community, I can "get it up" (so to
speak) on DISCUSSIONS with relevant facts and figures to
support my views. I'm used to it, can do it effectively.

Some of the worlds most destructive powers got to be that way with
the spoken word, not a gun.

That you can "baffle 'em with BS" doesn't make it true...It just
means you baffle well.

One thing I do NOT do is - like your sexual innuendo
misdirection - try to divert the discussion into some
mean-spirited self-frustrated ATTACK on other personalities.

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!

THAT'S ONE OF YOUR MOST OUTRAGEOUS, ABSOLUTLEY IDIOTIC AND
TRANSPARENT LIES E V E R LENNIE ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !

While that serves to temporarily HIDE YOU on your lack of
facts and logic on the SUBJECT under discussion, it is by
no means any sort of positive attribute for yourself.

READ WHAT YOU JUST WROTE THEN TRY TO LIVE IT, LENNIE ! ! ! ! ! !

It is
rather a negative attribute that shows how shallow and
ignorant you are with all that emotional instability of
hatred manifesting itself at every opportunity.

Well, THERE YOU GO! Ya just diagnosed yourself!

Putz.

Giving it back to you in your own style - 4 Q

Hardly!

Putz!

Steve, K4YZ