View Single Post
  #177   Report Post  
Old August 18th 05, 11:33 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default


an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
cut
dis dat


Len, we could apply the null hypothesis. It could have been a
disgruntled NCTA trying to make the PCTA look bad. But there's two
problems with that hypothesis:

sorry about mssing this one earlier


You gotta look at both sides if you want to be known as being fair and
balanced.

a. The NCTA have nothing to be disgruntled about except a quarter
century of arbitrary and unnecessary government regulation, and

and right Now I can't see how NCTA can be disgruntled the only
bothering me now is chopping at the bit wiating for it to be over

Even my non Ham freinds have noticed the improvement in my often
somewhat dower expression
and dared asked me to explain

that and I have have found myself breaking into song on the repeater
stuff like that


Stop right there. Even the slightest upturn at the corner of your
mouth might be mistaken as gloating.


way too late but I realy don't care, even at the club meeting with a
fair number of code supporter there were gracious enough to ask me what
I thought of NPRM, after first sugest ing everyone brace themsleves for
my response which a loud "YES, Bout damn time!!"


Was it tough getting the tar and feathers off? ;^)

b. The PCTA make themselves look bad without any help.

OTOH they do even better by just making em SEE happy folks


They'll form support groups to try to cope.


I hope so. think we should start a fund to help out?


Compassionate No-Codism? I'm good with that.