View Single Post
  #33   Report Post  
Old August 19th 05, 01:57 AM
Phil Kane
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 17 Aug 2005 17:14:57 GMT, wrote:

How about someone operating in such a way that they are in literal
compliance with the rule, but many others believe they are violating the
intent.


They can believe what they want, including that the moon is made of
green cheese, but if the operator is in compliance with the rules
there is no violation.

Mere holding of a ham license (or in specific cases, not holding a
ham license) does not make one an expert in interpretation of the
rules. I love to take on such "barracks lawyers"...like shooting
fish in a barrel.

Case closed. Next case.....

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane
(A REAL communications lawyer)