an_old_friend wrote:
Jim your posts could be made A Lot easier to read, by simply geting to
your point in staed of going and and on about event starting in mnay
case before i was born, and that you have related a number of times

"getting" "instead" "many"

Why don't you post more clearly?

His posts are crystal clear to anyone with more than a fifth grade
education.

simply becuase it does not suit YOUR style and wishes

So...it's your "suggestion" that Jim lobotomize himself just so
YOU can understand him a bit better...?!?!

Somehow I don't see that happening!

wrote:
K=D8HB wrote:
wrote

Allegedly.

Mark has claimed a lot of things in the past that
simply did not add up. Like claims of a 248 IQ...

proving you don't know much about medical matters

Where in that did Jim state ANYthing that required any "knowledge"
about medical matters...?!?!

You DID state that you have an IQ of 248.

Perhaps his condition is real, perhaps it isn't.
That's not the issue at all - the issue is what
he does about it.

He says the use of a spellchecker would slow him
down too much and that we're not worth the effort.

it would at least doueblt the amount of Time and the medium is not
worth the effort. If you want to take saying that Medium is not worth
the effort personaly you can of course

"doueblt"...I'm not even going to guess what that was supposed to
be...

"personally"

And what were you trying to say, anyway..?!?! Again, more
non-sensical jibberish masquerading as "English"....

I am not convinced the medium is worth the time I am spending Now let
alone more

Huh...?!?! What...?!?!

Give your newcomer a medical problem
(speech impediment?) and rewrite the story.

How about a person with a speech problem who
refuses to go to speech therapy, even though
the cost is low and improvement is clearly
possible?

and Who are you know what is possible. Stevie at least has some
exposure to medical matter although he clearly is off target

Nope. Got you nailed to the wall, Markie.

Not even Ray Charles could miss you!

Then we'll answer your question
"How should the group respond?"

Who is "we"?

who is we indeed?

You just don't get it, Markie...

Steve, K4YZ