RadioBanter - View Single Post - Day 9 Stevie when you going to fess up to your lies

August 24th 05, 10:47 PM

From: on Tues 23 Aug 2005 18:19

wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Sun 21 Aug 2005 20:33
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 21 Aug 2005 16:50:37 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote in
wrote:

You have already discussed your military service here so that excuse
is moot. Try again.

Nope.

As much as anyone else here, "Frank", you have more than enough
information to validate my service, assuming your insinuations of
intimacy with such notables as LtCol North are accurate.

"...insinuations of intimacy with..."? :-)

Whenever Steve sees two mens names side by side, he see a love
connection. Hope he never visits the Vietnam War Memorial.

...or comes within a klick of any group of BSA.

As I have found with OTHERS here, even when you DO give specifics,
the pat answer is "So, we just accept it because you say so?" , and
it's "just one more thing" to add to the flame war. It doesn't matter
how objective or reliable the corroborating source is.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. We all "must" accept Stebie's "word" on HIS
service, yet all he can do is shout "call the VA!" :-)

"It doesn't matter how objective or reliable the corroborating
source is..." if its against what Stebie said or if Stebie no
like it, it is a "LIE." :-)

Poor Stebie...he can't stand up to scrutiny and his "respone" is
to heap abuse on the personals of his challengers.

Steve is finally getting the attention that he seeks.

It's a sick, sociopathic way of getting attention.

I also notice you snipped the line where I suggested you e mail me
directly and I'd provide more than enough information, off group. You
didn't even take the time to answer it HERE, let alone privately.

Stebie, it takes as much time to write a single private e-mail
as it does to write a PUBLIC posting in here. Just write your
response IN PUBLIC if you want to be believed. That way anyone
can check it out as they wish. If it is verifiable, it will be
be believed. If it isn't verifiable, then you are just making
with a Confidence Game piece of BS.

He can't. After his widespread claims of seven hostile actions, he'll
never be able to show his records because they will prove that there
were no hostile actions.

They will prove HE wasn't in them. Between 1974 and 1992 the USA
was involved in MORE than 7 hostile actions.

This leads me to believe that it's most likely that if you did and
I research the headers, we'll find some close relationship between you
and one of the Infamous Four.

"...close relationship?!?" :-)

Probably a love quadrangle.

Heh heh heh heh. I'll call up my friend, the independent writer,
to see if he wants to contribute another "news item" to the
National Enquirer. :-)

Anyone can "research headers" and find the ISP of a poster, and
that's about IT. :-)

Sorry, little Stebie, but nobody has hacked the IEEE website
for the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
professional association. I may be the only one with that
"header origin." I have NO "relationship" with Frank, with Mark
or with Brian Burke, or Todd, don't know them personally, haven't
met them, don't even live close to them (don't know where Frank
lives, but that is irrelevant). WE all SHARE a feeling that all
you do is lay down a Snow Job, A Con Game Scam, lots of BS, and
a bunch of other nefarious braggadoccio. shrug

A hugely useless effort because none of it is credible.

Credible? It isn't even edible.

Lastly, I find it curious (and certainly lends significant
credence to doubting you and YOUR stories...) that you show up from no
where in an Amateur Radio forum, CLAIM to be a former Marine with
impeccable "references", yet have absolutely nothing to say ABOUT
Amateur Radio policy.

Tell us how the USMC "career" of Stebie Robeson "affects amateur
radio policy?" :-)

Tell us how the Civil Air Patrol "pilot in command" experience
relates to amateur radio policy? :-)

Tell us how being "A" NCOIC (or probably not being "A" NCOIC) of
Okinawa MARS relates to amateur radio policy?

To quote: "Sorry, Hans, MARS IS amateur radio!" :-)

Add that to language in your posts that sounds hauntingly like
Lennie Anderson and I'd say your accusations of fraud belong in your
own lap.

Poor baby, feeling worried are you?

Steve knows that Frank knows his game.

WE all know his "game" by now.

YOU just POST some verifiable REAL claims to your statements in
order to be believed. So far all you've done is shout "call the
VA!" [the VA will NOT divulge details unless one is a family
member or a reputable, verifiable personnel department of a
company or a verifiable agent of a police force]

You could digitize your DD214 and have it available for private
e-mail (this newsgroup doesn't carry binaries) to PROVE your
military release from active duty. It's only one page long.
But, you won't, claiming some "personal outrage" at having to
do such a thing! Oh, my. We are all supposed to BELIEVE you,
right? While everyone else not believing you LIES?" :-)

I don't beleive him. Too much sewage under the bridge.

Well, we've now got a NEW name for the sewage: "Dudly."

Thanks to Frank for emphasizing that. Too bad that Ernest K.
Gann isn't around to write that up much better now.

sew age