K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
No he isn't very practiced He forgets that at some points it is his
victum that decides what is a threat
No, Markie...It's a court of law that decides what a "threat" is.
Otherwise you could tell me the sky is blue and, if I deemed it so,
could say that's a "threat"
You're right! And those were his very words.
Sure is fun watching the two of you pat each other on the back!
Haven't seen so much self-congratulation for nothing at all since
Clinton's book came out...
Steve, K4YZ
Steve lies. Here's proof:
----------
Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a
case of your
misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking."
Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments
might be
read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y requires that
it be
perceived as such."
----------
So, was Steve lying then, or now?