Dear Mr. Cecil Moore,

I have already express my point of view
on this matter in another thread so
I can't do something more than to repeat a part of it, he

-
| But when there is such a steadfast loyalty
| to the existence of some kind of
| "interference"
| between two,
| rather clearly distinct waves,
| the incident and the reflected one,
| it is difficult for anybody
| to compromise himself and accept
| that the same two waves,
| so clearly distinct until now,
| when are coming along a line with complex Z0,
| have to bear in addition
| some kind of
|"interaction".
| -
| Very difficult, indeed.
-

Needless to say it,
but
I imply that I am the very one
who find it very difficult.

Sincerely yours,

pez
SV7BAX


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message ...
| pez wrote:
| Dear Mr. Roy Lewallen, There is no doubt
| your numerical example is a correct one.
|
| What about Roy's refusal to superpose like terms? With only
| two directions in a transmission line, it is impossible for
| there to exist a "third term" when there's no third possible
| direction.
| --
| 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
|
|
|
| -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
| http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
| -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----