Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
From: on Aug 25, 2:42 pm
K4YZ wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:
Hey, that's a neat idea! I gotta do that, keep it right next to my
Blue Nose card.
What kind of guy carries a copy of his DD-214 around with him?
The same kind of guy that I try to avoid being...the loud mouth at
the end of the bar telling everyone how he stormed the beaches...Laguna
Beach...Redondo Beach...Panama Beach...
You don't mind one bit bing the RRAP loudmouth. Always waving your
arms and claiming, "Liar, Liar Pants on Fiar!"
Tsk, tsk, tsk...Dudly kept talking about his "seven hostile actions"
and implying he was in the thick of them.
I've never bragged about being IN any hostile actions. If fact,
Jimmie Noserve took me to task about being a "rear-area" type.
I guess all those books he read (to become an expert on warfare)
didn't tell him that NOBODY got to "choose" where they were
assigned. Nonetheless, I got to work real HF radio communications
for three years in a 24/7 radio station...even living IN a two
square mile antenna field for a while. [many more antennas
there than overweight "scampering" Davie can possibly put up]
Just as they have not permitted you to comment about "amateur" radio
because you hold no license, NoServers may not comment about the
military.
Hold on, Sparky. Len has commented here at great length and on many,
many occasions.
And what has Jim's response been to Len's comments?
It has been quite varied and quite mild considering Len's typical
insulting demeanor. What Jim hasn't done is to prevent or attempt to
prevent Len from making those comments.
The PCTA, including Jim Miccolis/N2EY, immediately set upon
discrediting Len's comments and opinions.
Correct. Questioning or discrediting is not what you claimed. What you
said was that Len wasn't permitted to comment. You were incorrect.
We were instructed to discard Len's comments.
In the end, if they cannot
lay waste to Len's comments with rational argument(s)...
I've seen any number of Len's comments made to look like the product of
one who has little experience.
As Len has questioned your net control capabilities.
...they claim that
his opinions are simply no good because Len isn't a ham.
Sometimes Len's opinions are no good because they are issued because he
has no experience in amateur radio. Sometimes his opinions are no good
because they are the rantings of a geezer with an ax to grind. Often,
he makes factual errors and there have been numerous times when he
deliberately fabricates.
You want us to believe that all of Len's comments are to be discarded.
David Heil/K8MN is a primary culprit in that tactic, but Jim has used it as
well.
Oh no, I've by no means been "a primary culprit", but I have
participated over a period of years.
Can you guess how many times you've commented that Len isn't an amateur
radio operator?
Len isn't involved in amateur
radio. He wraps himself in bunting and writes of his Constitutional
rights of free speech and to petition his government. Well, he has done
those things. Nothing on this planet can prevent me from lauging at him
or ridiculing him or his ideas.
Nor him you.
Len writes of being denigrated or
insulted by those who do not agree with his him but he often insults and
denigrates those who have the opposite point of view.
Perhaps Len is correct to do so.
He is quick to tell others that they are not discussing amateur radio
policy,
Get a clue, he's giving it back to you. He's been told that he is not
an amateur radio operator and should be here. This is a place only of
amateurs and amateur things.
then he goes on a multi-post rant having everything to do with
personalities and nothing to do with amateur radio.
Have you ever thought of reigning in Robeson? When you do, get back to
me about Len and we'll talk some more.
You, of course, are Len's little electrolytic acolyte.
Dave K8MN
And you are the World Famous DXer that works out of band Frenchmen on 6
Meters.