wrote in message
oups.com...
Today's Scorecard in the NCTA v. PCTA Amateur NPRM Opinions!
26 Aug 05, WT Docket 05-235 Comments on Test Element 1
Elimination/Retention a
Total 1923
Indeterminate/duplicates (note 1) 94
Unambiguously Against NPRM (note 2) 524 28.65%
Unambiguously For NPRM (note 3) 1040 56.86%
Code test ONLY for Extras (note 4) 265 14.49%
Notes:
1. Includes duplicate postings from same individual, "joke"
or "test" entries which do not have a valid address, or
polemicizing a personal pet peeve which has nothing to
do with the NPRM, individuals not understanding the
scope and purpose of the NPRM, one foreign citizen
submission, and six who were commenting on another
matter having nothing to do with amateur radio regulations.
2. Includes only those who are whole-heartedly AGAINST
the NPRM and against dropping any code testing.
3. Includes only those who are whole-heartedly FOR the
NPRM and the abolition of the morse code test.
4. These are "in-betweeners" who wish to retain the code
test for the "highest" class (Extra) but will accept
eliminating the code test for other classes.
Percentage figures are calculated against the Total less
the number of Indeterminate entries. For all up to
being received by 26 Aug 05 that would be 1829.
As of 29 Aug 05, there still hasn't been any notice in the
Federal Register under Federal Communications Commission on
the NPRM FCC 05-143 or WT Docket 05-235. I wonder why not?
Stay tuned...the future of U.S. amateur radio is being made,
like it or not.
cup kin
Hello, Len
I personally am not concerned about code/no code. My problem is how easy do
they wish to make the multiple guess test. Frankly, folks that don't have
to work for something seldom appreciate it. Didn't they find that out with
welfare?
Then again, I might be wrong.
If you gave away the licenses with no test at all (no test international?),
a lot of folks might well say "no" and a lot of the rest wouldn't appreciate
it anyways.
Just my humble opinion.
73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA