Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
From: on Aug 25, 2:42 pm
K4YZ wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:
Just as they have not permitted you to comment about "amateur" radio
because you hold no license, NoServers may not comment about the
military.
Hold on, Sparky. Len has commented here at great length and on many,
many occasions.
And what has Jim's response been to Len's comments?
It has been quite varied and quite mild considering Len's typical
insulting demeanor. What Jim hasn't done is to prevent or attempt to
prevent Len from making those comments.
The PCTA, including Jim Miccolis/N2EY, immediately set upon
discrediting Len's comments and opinions.
Correct. Questioning or discrediting is not what you claimed. What you
said was that Len wasn't permitted to comment. You were incorrect.
We were instructed to discard Len's comments.
...and you always follow instruction--right?
And you always give instruction not to be followed--right?
In the end, if they cannot
lay waste to Len's comments with rational argument(s)...
I've seen any number of Len's comments made to look like the product of
one who has little experience.
As Len has questioned your net control capabilities.
Net control capabilities? What in the world are you going on about?
Opening and closing a RTTY net with CW. Hi!
...they claim that
his opinions are simply no good because Len isn't a ham.
Sometimes Len's opinions are no good because they are issued because he
has no experience in amateur radio. Sometimes his opinions are no good
because they are the rantings of a geezer with an ax to grind. Often,
he makes factual errors and there have been numerous times when he
deliberately fabricates.
You want us to believe that all of Len's comments are to be discarded.
I'd settle for 80-90%.
About the same percentage as your commnets. Imagine that!
David Heil/K8MN is a primary culprit in that tactic, but Jim has used it as
well.
Oh no, I've by no means been "a primary culprit", but I have
participated over a period of years.
Can you guess how many times you've commented that Len isn't an amateur
radio operator?
I didn't know there was going to be a quiz.
There is always a quiz where your motives are concerned.
It has to be fewer than the
number of recountings of his ADA tale or his comments about FCC staffers
don't need to hold amateur radio licenses.
Are FCC staffers required to hold an amateur radio license in order to
hold their positions?
Len isn't involved in amateur
radio. He wraps himself in bunting and writes of his Constitutional
rights of free speech and to petition his government. Well, he has done
those things. Nothing on this planet can prevent me from lauging at him
or ridiculing him or his ideas.
Nor him you.
That's where I came in. Len's been doing that almost since my first
posts to this newsgroup in 1996.
Congratulations on almost a century of posting meaningless drivel.
Len writes of being denigrated or
insulted by those who do not agree with his him but he often insults and
denigrates those who have the opposite point of view.
Perhaps Len is correct to do so.
The signs point to his not being correct.
Please point out those "signs."
He is quick to tell others that they are not discussing amateur radio
policy,
Get a clue, he's giving it back to you. He's been told that he is not
an amateur radio operator and should be here. This is a place only of
amateurs and amateur things.
I don't think Len has ever been told that he should be here. :-)
Typo. You really are a frustrated technical writer, aren't you?
Back to the subject.
Len has declared a several-decades-long "interest" in amateur radio.
OK.
He's never been interested enough to even attempt passing a license
exam.
How do you know that?
Len was going to go for an "Extra right out of the box" several
years back. That hasn't happened.
How do you know that?
We have him declaring within the
past few months that he has *no interest* in obtaining an amateur radio
license. Tsk, tsk. What is one to believe?
Perhaps he has tried and failed. Many people fail the tests.
then he goes on a multi-post rant having everything to do with
personalities and nothing to do with amateur radio.
Have you ever thought of reigning in Robeson?
Am I in charge of Steve's postings? Feel free to take on the job if you
think it should be done.
Yet you think that you are in charge of Anderson. You take it as a
personal challenge to reign in Len's postings. Why is that?
When you do, get back to
me about Len and we'll talk some more.
Howzzat? Did I suggest that it is up to you to control Len's bad behavior?
Then end your decade-long griping about Len. Take your own advice and
simply don't read it. And don't start tail-ending someone elses
comments as Jim has, in order to comment on Len's opinions. Hi!
You, of course, are Len's little electrolytic acolyte.
And you are the World Famous DXer that works out of band Frenchmen on 6
Meters.
Well, I certainly operate on 6m, but always within the regs which govern
my amateur radio operation. I don't control French radio amateurs any
more than I'm responsible for Steve's posts.
Dave K8MN
I'd prefer not to engage out of band Frenchmen on six meters, and not
to give Robeson a pass on his outrageous behavio[u]r by remaining
silent.
You, of course, will do both.