Dee Flint wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
"an Old friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

cut
Dave K8MN


And it wasn't considered an upgrade. It simply allowed them to have
not
only their own privileges but the privileges of the "lowest" license
class.

boy you must be popular when you talk to the techs you insult there
licenses


And how is factual data considered an insult?

by showing the Speacker as an elistist

That you even think in such terms is insulting

At the introduction of the No Code Tech

Fact: Novice was the lowest class requiring one written and one code
test.
Fact: Tech was a "higher" license class requiring the Novice written &
Tech
written but not the Novice code and did not grant Novice privileges.
Fact: To get Novice privileges, Techs had to pass the Novice code.

What is insulting about that?

It is a fact that I have come to consider you an Elist Bitch, given the
factual nature of that statement and BYS you shoud not be insulted by
the statement

However I suspect you will be

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Not in the least. Those suffering from paranoia have no power to insult me
Indeed another MD amoug us

regardless of their choice of words and attempts to do so. In addition,
elitest is a qualitative judgement which I do not have to accept as fact.

wether you accept it or not it is clearly a fact

Bitch is totally inaccurate as I am a human being not a canine so again I do
not have to accept it as fact.

ah yes the ability to see only the difinition you want to see

but none of your ranting changes the fact you are an elitist bitch


On the other hand, as licenses are defined by the FCC, Novice is a lower
class license that Tech. Tech is a lower class license than General and so
on. I did not create the classes or the definitions. Since I have chosen
to be a licensed amateur, I must abide by the FCC's definitions.

but you choose to be insulting by pointing things out in those terms


Dee D. Flint, N8UZE