Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

cut

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


I can see now I am fighting with a mental case. Here is a suggestion "old
friend" START a VHF NET. Get some stations with HF capabilities to link
with the HF network. There you are....your now in the system. Don't know
how to do it? Don't trust my advice? Check with ARRL.org. DOn't trust
them either probably.

again with with yours suggestions/orders?

I doubt that trying to dublicate the effort of the HF hams would go
over very well

Just who are you to tell how to run MY station/

If I am a mental case for asserting my own autonomy then so be it

It isn't a matter of Trusting the ARRL it is a matter I don't support
the ARRL, I don't feel they have been represnting the true interests of
the ARS, other such as Carl Stevenson have held these views as well
(although he seems to have changed his mind, and if he is succesfull I
may give them another chance to earn my support)

EXACTLY what some firebrands did in this part of Alabama. They started
their own V/Uhf system. And it is a fabulous success. Oh...is that
bragging again?

You know what? I realy don't want to be such a fireband I have heard
other round here tell their stories and am getting the feel of the land
indeed I agree that HF based net make more sense here in the UP than
VHF or UHF nets

Indeed we have enough trouble maintianing our Skywarn nets on VHF
hopefully the new 6M repeater we will soon have will help, if not I and
everyone else will have to look at it some more

Dan/W4NTI