Dave Heil wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
cut

the flirts were there esp when combined with other posts I have cited
in the past

Not true. That too is a fabrication.


not as I saw it and continue to see it

simply disgreeing with is not lying Dave

No it isn't. You aren't simply disagreeing. You posted deliberate
falsehoods and now you are lying on top of your initial lies. Then
again, you're an admitted liar.

No I am simply reading em the way I see em

No falsehood at all

why are you so threatened by that?

cut

No flasehood no malicious one

Just calling your posts as I see em

It is most interesting that you rant and rail at others as you call them
all "lier", but that you deny, over and over, your own untruths, even in
the face of easily obtainable proof.

If there was unturth id be prepared to admit it

from where I am siting you wer exchanging a number of flirtaous pots
with a Bisexual female o a Hg mostly of peronal ads

cut

...except that what you said you found turned out not to exist.


Seems to to my reading

Then again, you're dyslexic.

yes I am your point?


No malice there

There certainly was malice. You were corrected and even in the face of
overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you continued the lies.


more lies on your part

See what I mean? You call others liars when the truth is evident. You
aren't wrapped too tight.

no I don't see what you mean

the turth is I see your post as flirtaous

that is a fact

that you can call them something else in your mind has nothing to do
with that fact

No malice no proof of anything

but you are so senitive about it that you are convining that you may
have even had an affair with this woman

I'm convining? How does one convine? Well, Lieutenant/Colonel Morgan,
you're about as goofy as they come.

by protesting your inocence of such a trival matter so violently


then you demanded I back em up and I did so

You backed up nothing and shredded what was left of your credibility.


immpossible you cliamed I had none before

Great. Google it up.

already done


therefore your statement that I shredded any was a lie or you previous
statement was

Naw, Mark, you're lying again, just to keep in practice.

no need for that Dave


"My credibilty in this NG not important. I never claim to make
point based on requiring that I be seen as honest here sso why should
it bother me?"

-- Mark Morgan June, 29, 2000



so?

"So?" That's the best you can do? "So?" It is bad enough for you to
be dishonest. You take it to a new level, trumpeting it from the rooftops.

It isn't bad at all as far as Im concerned I don't owe you turth esp
when you don't deliver it in reuturn

so is the answer

You and Stevie keep projecting your values

are you so stupid you can't understand I don't accept them?

This NG is pretty unimortant to me I have said so many time in many
ways

...yet you find it important enough to show up on a regular basis these
days.

It kills times

why are you so frighten of what I say?

Frightened? You must have come to a faulty conclusion, Colonel. I have
no fear at all of you. You're a perverse individual, lacking in
redeeming qualities. I see you as pitiful.

Then why are you concerned about my posts?


In one night, you've threatened death to an individual and you've called
a very nice woman an elitist bitch.

Done neither


Dave K8MN