RadioBanter - View Single Post - Laying Waste to Frank Of Silliland's Silliness

September 7th 05, 06:06 PM

wrote:
From: on Sun 4 Sep 2005 06:09

Dave Heil wrote:

wrote:

From: on Aug 28, 8:18 am

You know, the one which
brought about the creation of Jim's apropos profile of your
likely actions:

N2EY: "Besides, here's a simple, plain fact:

No matter what job, educational level, employer, or
government/military service that a radio amateur has, if
said radio
amateur opposes Mr. Anderson's views, he/she will be
the target of Mr.
Anderson's insults, ridicule, name-calling, factual
errors, ethnic
slurs, excessive emoticons and general infantile behavior."

Actually there's an updated version:

No matter what employment, education, experience or
government/military service a person has, if that
person opposes Mr. Anderson's views, he/she will be
the target of Mr. Anderson's insults, ridicule,
name-calling, factual errors, ethnic/gender/racial slurs,
excessive emoticons and general infantile behavior.

Translation: JIMMIE DOES NOT TOLERATE DISSENT!!! :-)

Your translation leaves much to be desired. Jim tolerates dissent just
fine. What he has done is create what, to this point, is a very
accurate description of your likely behavior toward those who dare
disagree with your views.

Wow...talk about "telling someone to 'shut up!'" :-)

You can talk about it, but Jim's profile of your likely behavior doesn't
tell you to shut up. You have, of course, told others to shut up or to
go away.

I've found it to be a very accurate predictor of Len's
behavior on rrap. Len of course has parodied/plaigirized
and in doing so simply provide more proof of its validity.

Translation: JIMMIE IS *ALWAYS RIGHT*!!! :-)

I can't recall a post where Jim claims that he is always right. You're
still using the diminuitive form of his name, thereby fulfilling the
profile's prediction of your behavior. You can't seem to avoid
fulfilling the profile.

Note that the profile does not call Len names or
other direct insults. It simply predicts his behavior when
faced with opposition to his views.

Yes, how DARE I speak against the Mighty Miccolis? :-)

See? You're still unable to avoid fulfilling the predictions set out in
the profile.

Perhaps Len considers such opposition to be the
ultimate insult to him.

Poor baby. Really hurting when you can't stomach the
give-and-take in here? :-)

You can't help yourself, can you?

What Jim hasn't done is to prevent or attempt to

prevent Len from making those comments.

Nor would I. What I have done is to point out errors
in Len's reasoning and claims. And I backed it up
with google quotes and other info.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. Jimmie CANNOT "shut me up" so he tries
the next best thing: Disingenuous insults in the form
of the Profiler's "Prediction" wherein all who disagree
(all those who DARE disagree that is) are uncivilly
chastised in a "formal" manner.

Jim's profile isn't about "all those". It is about you.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. Jimmie can't even reply directly to me.
No guts, I suppose. shrug

Shrug all you like. Fill a screen with "Poor baby", "Tsk, tsk, tsk",
"Jimmie", capital letters and shrugs. You just continue to fulfill the
profile of your predicted actions toward those who don't agree with you.

For example, some time back Len posted that all hams could
continue to operate legally with licenses that were in the grace
period. I showed that to be in error, by simply quoting the
appropriate sections of Part 97. Len's behavior in response to
that was typical of the profile.

Right now, there's not a damn thing Jimmie can do about
it...

There's plenty that people "can do about it". No one chooses to.
Not worth the time or effort.

So...why all the "time and effort" to do this INDIRECT REPLY?

:-)

Slow down and regroup, Len. Jim has done nothing to prevent
you from
commenting to this newsgroup or to your government. Your rant is vapor.

Dave, consider that perhaps Len considers *any* opposition to
his views as an attempt to silence him.

Poor baby. Still can't take the give-and-take in a newsgroup,
can you?

You can "poor baby" but you didn't address Jim's comment.

The PCTA, including Jim Miccolis/N2EY, immediately set upon
discrediting Len's comments and opinions.

Free speech includes the right to discredit other's comments and
opinions if those comments and opinions are not based on facts and
sound logical reasoning. Some of Len's comments and opinions are not
based on facts and sound logical reasoning.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. "Free speech" does not mean that opposition to
the Words of the ARRL shall be silenced.

When have you been silenced? What have you to do with the ARRL or with
amateur radio?

Jimmie speaks as a
parrot of the Words of the ARRL.

That certainly looks like another of your factual errors.

Jimmie wants to re-argue and re-argue and re-argue OLD arguments
that appeared in here, perhaps hoping to "win" one that he lost
long ago? Yes, that is "free speech" but it does NOTHING.

You've carped on many of the same issues for nearly a decade. You've
argued and re-argued those issues. Are you hoping to win one?

In the end, if they cannot
lay waste to Len's comments with rational argument(s),
they claim that
his opinions are simply no good because Len isn't a ham.

Actually the logic is quite different. It comes down to
asking why Len is so interested in amateur radio policy
even though Len is not a ham and has never been one. There
has been a nocodetest amateur radio license in the USA since
1991, yet Len never got one. The maximum code test required
for any US amateur radio license has been 5 wpm since 1990 (with
medical waiver) and since 2000 without a waiver.

Oh, my, Mighty Miccolis the Moral Minder, meandering the
morass of MOTIVES! :-)

That certainly looks like it fulfills several of the profile's predictions.

Okay, everyone fill out the Motive form in triplicate so
that Mighty Mindcontrol Miccolis can JUDGE all for "rightness"
in saying anything in here!

There are a few items which fit the profile.

Nor is Len a manufacturer of amateur radio equipment, nor does
he have anything to do with FCC.

Jimmie no work at FCC. Jimmie no work in electronics.
Jimmie NOT "manufacturer of amateur radio equipment." Jimmie
make state-of-the-art radio transmitter using vacuum tubes
at cost of $100 in 1990s, show picture on home page. Must be
single prototype of "new product". All cheer, applaud.

....more profile fulfillment. The fact is, you don't know what Jim does
for a living. You know that he is a EE. No, he doesn't work at the
FCC, but he is involved in amateur radio. You aren't involved as a
participant or a regulator.

More than 5-1/2 years ago, Len told us he was going for Extra,
but didn't say when, and it hasn't happened yet.

Keeps you guessing, donut? :-)

I've never guessed about that issue at all, Leonard. I was quite
certain that you'd never be a licensed radio amateur.

Jimmie hasn't told us of his expertise in "parenting" either.
Jimmie hasn't presented his degrees in pediatrics whereby he
be Expert on raising chilluns. How can you conceive expertise?

Jimmie get laid yet?

....just more profile fulfillment.

And regardless of how someone replies to Len's posts here, Len will
reply according to the profile.

The "Profiler" show on TV got cancelled, Jimmie. Consider you
self going same way... :-)

....and additional profile fulfillment.

It's just his way.

"It ain't braggin' if ya done it."

You'd be awfully foolish to write "I fulfill N2EY's profile of my likely
behavior", but I think you've just done something similar. So be it.

Dave K8MN