an Old friend wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:

"Dave Heil" wrote in message
hlink.net...

cut

I'm responding to you, aren't I?

Dave K8MN

More likely you could beat him 100:1 since even I could probably manage 10:1
as I suspect that you are far better than I. One member of our club set a
new personal best last Field Day of 1000 contacts on 40 meters mixed CW and
phone. At least half of them were CW.\


boy you are in deep mis elitist Bitch

Why don't you exercise some civility and self-control?

but of course I know Daves style on here

Asuming I accept his challenge and win I gain nothing of value since
Dave will never adknowledge it

I've stated here (this makes the third time) that I'll publicly
acknowledge your CW operating prowess in this forum. The scores would
be submitted to the ARRL for publication on the League website.
The League's results are broken down into QSOs and final score.
We'll go strictly by the number of QSOs made during the FD period.
I'll take your worthless word that you've had no assistance, other than
from your computer. You may have one, two or three individuals,
mutually agreed on by us, to watch me like a hawk during the entire
operation, if you like.

but neither of you nor can both of you bait me into accepting
challange that wouls be adknowledged

You would receive your due if you were to actually come up with 1 QSO to
my 15 QSOs. You know there is a catch, of course, and that is making
you leary. The catch is that you know and I know that you can't succeed
and that I'd pound you like a drum. I don't blame you for being a
little nervous. After all, your self-respect is on the line.

Dave's history of evasion is clear on that score

That's a sheer fabrication, and you know it. You're simply ducking the
challenge. It's okay to know your limitations and to abide by them,
even if you have to weasel by trying to raise some non-existent "history
of evasion". Is it on or isn't it?

Dave K8MN