Dave Heil wrote:
an Old friend wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:

"Dave Heil" wrote in message
hlink.net...

cut

I'm responding to you, aren't I?

Dave K8MN

More likely you could beat him 100:1 since even I could probably manage 10:1
as I suspect that you are far better than I. One member of our club set a
new personal best last Field Day of 1000 contacts on 40 meters mixed CW and
phone. At least half of them were CW.\


boy you are in deep mis elitist Bitch


Why don't you exercise some civility and self-control?

I am I am in full control of myself, and the object of the address has
stated that she does not find it offensive or insulting



but of course I know Daves style on here

Asuming I accept his challenge and win I gain nothing of value since
Dave will never adknowledge it

I've stated here (this makes the third time) that I'll publicly

And I don't believe you

acknowledge your CW operating prowess in this forum. The scores would
be submitted to the ARRL for publication on the League website.

but that mans Id have to NOT support my club for FD overwise my scorre
will be lumped in with theirs

The League's results are broken down into QSOs and final score.
We'll go strictly by the number of QSOs made during the FD period.
I'll take your worthless word that you've had no assistance, other than

and I don't believe youd take my word

from your computer. You may have one, two or three individuals,
mutually agreed on by us, to watch me like a hawk during the entire
operation, if you like.

right like I know anyone in WV

but neither of you nor can both of you bait me into accepting
challange that wouls be adknowledged

You would receive your due if you were to actually come up with 1 QSO to
my 15 QSOs. You know there is a catch, of course, and that is making

The catch is you don't tell the turth and so I don't believe you

you leary. The catch is that you know and I know that you can't succeed
and that I'd pound you like a drum. I don't blame you for being a
little nervous. After all, your self-respect is on the line.

Dave's history of evasion is clear on that score

That's a sheer fabrication, and you know it. You're simply ducking the

no it is simple truth, You spent weeks refusing to answer simple
questions. You will likely find some way of evading admitting to my
sucess assuming I pull it off and we (the NG) will never hear the end
of it if i should fail.

If I were to accept a "chalenge" in which no desirable outcome is
possiblethen I would the fool you claim I am

challenge. It's okay to know your limitations and to abide by them,
even if you have to weasel by trying to raise some non-existent "history
of evasion". Is it on or isn't it?

Dave K8MN