Fritz Wuehler wrote:
In article . net
Dave Heil wrote:


You know? How would you know? You're just some guy hiding behind
anonymous remailers.


And you're hiding behind other things that are so obvious. Like seeing Roger
everywhere.

Sorry, that is incorrect. I don't see Roger at all. He spends a lot of
time hiding. Right now he hides behind anonymous remailers.

And posting under other names.

You spend much time trying to uncover the identities of your various
adversaries. You aren't very successful. I post under nothing but my
e-mail address. Take it to the bank.


And trying to be a moderator of a public
newsgroup.

No, I've never attempted to moderate an unmoderated newsgroup.


Is everyone targeting me?


Your backside has taken quite a number of hits, according to the Google
archives. Especially of late, when the pretend Marine is absent.

Why, not at all, Roger. One has only to look up "Roger Wiseman",
"AB8MQ" or "KC8JBO" to find someone who has taken *real* hits--and
justifiably so.

Is everyone using anonymous remailers?


If they did, would you whine more than you usually do?

If they did, you wouldn't have any idea who I am.

Does everyone monitor local repeaters


I don't hear your local repeaters. I would imagine most hams monitor their
local repeaters.


and the West Virginia Phone Net?


It sounds like your mental illness is in full swing. Now, you'll reply some
lame comment about hearing sounds, but as usual, you'll just be projecting your
own numerous shortcomings onto others.

Oh, maybe you're a different anonymous type than the one who report
hearing my signal checking into that net. *snicker*

Trying hiding behind a 4 x 4, Roger.


Why would I, since I'm not Roger, you stupid man.


Sure they have, a number of times, and you've been invited to see them
as well.


No, they haven't and no, I haven't. I can't speak for anybody else, though.
I'm sure you'll be able to post proof that Roger has, you wouldn't make
unsubstantiated comments, now would you?

Oh, right. I get it. Mum's the word. ;-) The comments I've made about
Roger Wiseman don't begin to do him justice.

No, not the self-proclaimned "A-1
operator" with the "strict morals."

You've made a mistake. I didn't proclaim myself an A-1 Op. It doesn't
work that way. The ARRL Web has listings by call and by name.

And since when does the police deny freedom of speech?

Since when *do* the police, not *does* the police.


Wrong. You should brush up on your English skills, former errand boy.

That's incorrect. The word Police is plural. Better luck next time.

Your freedom of speech stops where my rights begin.


Ah, there's that Nazi way we've all come to see in you, Dave Vile. Afraid the
U.S. Consitution disagrees with your narrow minded views, Vile. We don't see
you trying to contact the police at An Old Friend's or Lennie's location. Just
Roger's. More of your stalking of him, I suppose. Too bad for you nothing can
or will be done to anybody. Better save all that hot air, it's likely to be
cold in West Virginny this winter.

Neither Mark Morgan nor Len Anderson has posted any filth regarding
members of my family. Neither of them has ever sent e-mail threats to
my home. Be very, very careful, Roger.

Why don't you make it your life's work to try to find out?


Why don't you quit lying about your so called State Department "experiences?"

What do you know of my or anyone's State Department experience?


You know nothing of my activies on 6m from overseas.


You bragged about talking to out of band Frenchmen.

You'd better do your Google homework. You're short on facts.
What are my 6m activities to you?


By the way, it is "a world class DXer", not "an world class DXer".


No. You flunk English grammar again, former errand boy.

Sorry. Better luck next time. That's two down and only one to go.

Makes little difference, I've never claimed to be either.


More lies. It must make a difference, as defensive as you are about the comment.

I was very clear about what I wrote. It makes little difference as I've
never claimed to be either.

One can't listen in to a public net on a clear frequency? Are you trying to

say

someone can't listen in to a net? And so you have confirmed you have crappy

on-

air audio.

By your rather convoluted logic, I mention that you lurk, but don't
check into, a Section Net and that somehow confirms something about my
transmitted audio?

Wrong, Vile. You have no idea how many people listen into a net, do you? Or is
listening to a net against Dave Vile's rules? Will those that listen to a net
without your permission have to send "I will not listen to a net" a thousand
times by morse code as punishment?

You're drifting. How does my mentioning that you lurk, but don't check
into a Section net confirm something about my transmitted audio as you
claimed?

Ta Ta, Phantom,

Dave K8MN