an Old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an Old friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

cut



You never found anything about me flirting and you never found any "gay
bashing" either. I'm sure you could find my opposition to gay marriage.
I'm sure that you know that I find homosexuality to be forbidden by my
religion and that I can't find the words to adequately express my


and you admit here to your gay bashing by repeating it in summary form

That is not gay bashing.cut


it certainly is


cut I object to homosexuality on religious grounds.cut


so what?


cut I object to the concept of gay marriage.


so what?


I find homosexual
practice to be disgusting and repugnant.


clearly gay bashing

I'm sorry, Mark. They aren't gay bashing, no matter how much you choose
to believe that they are. I'm not going to engage you and have you play
a game of "so?" or "yes, it is" with me.

No law in this country can
force me to like or accept your perverse form of sexuality but I make
no attempt to prevent it or to harm you in any way.


another lie

That just isn't correct, Mark.

you seek and support harm the Gay and bisexaul citizins of the nations
by dening them te same legal standing for theire relationship as you
enjoy in yours

There is no recognized right of homosexuals to marry those of their own
gender. They have the equal right to marry one of the opposite gender.
You, as a bisexual, don't get to marry one of each gender. If you think
the morse code battle was a tough one, try to have an estimated 3% of
the population try to pass such laws in a country where a large majority
is dead set against it.

you also seek to use the fact I am Bisexual as an excuse to attack me
in forum where my sexual orientation is not relavant, this harms me and
proves you a liar

Mark, you have a number of issues. If you thought your bisexuality
would harm you, you surely wouldn't have posted the things you did in
other newsgroups. Right now, you're attempting to engage me in an
argument over your bisexuality. I don't accept it and don't condone it.
If you and whoever, want to engage in whatever sexual acts you engage in
and you'd like to sprinkle in a little game of pee-on-me or spank-me, in
the privacy of someone's home, then go for it. If you want to pray to
some trees and shrubs, be my guest. If you want to blame life's
problems on your dyslexia, do it. But I don't intend to accord you
victim status or call you "special". I remember too well your
description of learning morse code at 5 wpm as "torture".

disgust. I'm sure that you didn't find the material I suggested that
you seek because you are incapable of using Google's search engine.


no it is becuase of one of 2 thing (i can't tell which at this point)

One possiblity is that I lack enough details about your claims to have
a narrow enough search to have a chance to find it

That was addressed by my earlier comment.


no it wasn't you have refused to provide enough detail to make a real
search

Then so be it.


My comment: "The only folks who know for sure are those who worked me on
6m....and me"


another Daveie lie what you realy said was "You just jumped to a false
conclusion. Folks here know only because I've seen fit to tell them."
[plus the other statement


Your response: "Not at all just one you don't like"


and my response is that the statement quoted again

and it is true I came to one (conclusion) that you don't like

I came to this conclusion becuase you after days of asking reused to
answer my questions, therefore as I said I would I have to accept
Brain's account of the matter

It is tiresome to keep explaining things to you, Mark. You have no
first hand knowledge of my 6m operation from overseas. Brian has no
first hand knowledge of my 6m operation from overseas. The
ever-anonymous Roger Wiseman has no first hand knowledge of my 6m
operation from overseas.


none of these folks to my knwoledge hhas any such claim

but based on your accounts we have formed opinions

You can form opinions until you're blue in the face. You're forming
them based on second-hand and sometimes third-hand knowledge.

cut

I am under no obligation to provide you answers just because you have
questions.


I never claimed you did but if you want me to accept your claims then
you must met my terms

If you'll recall, I wasn't making the claims. Brian Burke made claims
about me. Wow, you're thick.

Based on the info you have provide I can see no other conclusion but
that you are willing to knowingly aid and bet others in the breaking of
thier local laws

Folks can get plastic surgery but it tough to fix stupidity.

You might be able to change that opinion but you have to answer my
questions to do so

That you will not answer a few simple questions makes me believe the
answers will support my existing conclusion.

that you refuse to take such a simple to establish my trust means I
will consider taking any "challenge" of yours.

Let's cut to the chase, Mark. I don't really care about answering
questions for you, what your conclusions are or whether you consider
taking the FD challenge which you've already said you wouldn't take.

__
AR

Dave K8MN