nobodys_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys_old_friend wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote:
wrote:
I don't make fun of other people's religious faith.
So what? Is a persons faith a sacred cow? Should Mormons (the men of
course) be allowed to marry as many women as they want?
As many as they want? maybe not, as many as they can convince to marry
sure, why not?
Uhhhhhhhhhhh...it's against the law.
so what?
That's exactly what I expect from the Pivot Man of the Feeble
Five.
that law is wrong
No, it's not.
indeed I think the morman could get it
struck down as unconstitutional using much the same approuch as the gay
right folks in striking at Amendment 2 in CO an the anti sodomy law of
TX
"Morman" "approach"
No, they won't, and for the very reasons I stated.
We see here your weakness shows up in the Code issue but dominates your
life
My only "weakness" is my intolerance for liars and deceivers such
as yourself.
However we see YOUR weakness, which is to simply "allow" anything
that allows YOU to just do as you darn well please, and to Hell with
the consequences.
Nothing may ever be allowed to change
Sure it can.
You're trying to perpetuate a LennieLie that has itself been
proven wrong over and over and over.
why should polygamy be banned? why for that matter shoudl polyandry be
banned?
Let's start of with inability to support the extended family for
one.
if that is the issue you add an ecomonic test to the maaraige system,
"economic" "marriage"
Indeed there should be. I also believe there should be a license
to breed.
However it's statistically proven fact that the more mouths you
have to feed the less likely you are to be able to adequately provide
for ALL the needs of ALL the members of the family.
The number one problem in polygamy-prone communities is abject
poverty. Follow that with chronic medical problems associated with
in-breeding.
no one said anything about striking down other laws about cousins and
stuff like that
I wish I knew what you were trying to say.
more of Stevie as a religous bigot
It's got nothing to do with "religion", Markie.
"Polygamy" is NOT a religion. It IS a "practice" that some
religions encourage.
More evidence of Markie running his mouth off.
further by what right do you dictate the level of economics in a
counouity
WTF is a "counouity"...?!?!
And as for "dictating the level of economics", I didn't.
However the various state children's protective agencies draw the
poverty line based upon gross income and the number of souls in the
family.
No mention of religion...
Utah before the banning of Polygamy was a stable reasonably properous
splace, the towns where they practive it now out of sight lack the
resources to support themselve wether mongamy or polygamy is rule
"prosperous" "place" "practice" "themselves" "monogamy"
They used to be "prosperous" when the economy was almost 90%
aggrarian.
Not so today. Most of those multi-spousal "families" are nothing
more than multiple-dwelling groups where "dad" can stay tonight and
procreate yet another mouth to feed.
Chavez should file charges. Let due process work. BTW, that due
process was set up by evil religious people.
Ummm, where?
Not sure wher Pat is a resident, but in the state where Pat lives is a
good place to start
Guess you missed the point, Markie...
not at all
Absolutely at all.
Bravo! I was wondering if you were racist and only hated WASP's that
call for Jihad.
Where do you get this stuff Brian? I don't like any religion that tries
to impress it's beliefs on others, that engages in killing in the name
of God, and in general allows people of "faith" to use that faith to
cause harm.
indeed then you are much a fan of Cristain beliefs then I take it
"Christian" "than"
cut speeling cop
"SPELLING", you nitwit!
Sheesh! What an I D I O T ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Steve, K4YZ