K4YZ wrote:
nobodys_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
cut

Uhhhhhhhhhhh...it's against the law.

so what?

That's exactly what I expect from the Pivot Man of the Feeble
Five.

the truth glad not to disapoint you

that law is wrong

No, it's not.

sure is as is any law based solely on the medevil concepts evolved by
the church

indeed I think the morman could get it
struck down as unconstitutional using much the same approuch as the gay
right folks in striking at Amendment 2 in CO an the anti sodomy law of
TX

"Morman" "approach"

No, they won't, and for the very reasons I stated.

that is you opinion, and not likely worth very much

We see here your weakness shows up in the Code issue but dominates your
life

My only "weakness" is my intolerance for liars and deceivers such
as yourself.

your weakness is your bigotry, but you can't se it of course.

A post with nothing that can be called a lie and still you flame and
flame

However we see YOUR weakness, which is to simply "allow" anything
that allows YOU to just do as you darn well please, and to Hell with
the consequences.

and this a about me NOW? when did that happen I missed it

as I have said I don't esp support marraiage at all

Nothing may ever be allowed to change

Sure it can.

not according to you, once set set in law it must stay forever.

Jim Crow was once Law too

You're trying to perpetuate a LennieLie that has itself been
proven wrong over and over and over.

why should polygamy be banned? why for that matter shoudl polyandry be
banned?

Let's start of with inability to support the extended family for
one.

if that is the issue you add an ecomonic test to the maaraige system,

"economic" "marriage"

Indeed there should be. I also believe there should be a license
to breed.

as yes the Facist shows his head

However it's statistically proven fact that the more mouths you
have to feed the less likely you are to be able to adequately provide
for ALL the needs of ALL the members of the family.

The number one problem in polygamy-prone communities is abject
poverty. Follow that with chronic medical problems associated with
in-breeding.

no one said anything about striking down other laws about cousins and
stuff like that

I wish I knew what you were trying to say.

no you don't

more of Stevie as a religous bigot

It's got nothing to do with "religion", Markie.

yes it does

"Polygamy" is NOT a religion. It IS a "practice" that some
religions encourage.

never said it was a religion

but it is a practice you disapove of for religious reasons and that you
seek to maintaina ban becuase it suits your religous bigotry

More evidence of Markie running his mouth off.

cut
Utah before the banning of Polygamy was a stable reasonably properous
splace, the towns where they practive it now out of sight lack the
resources to support themselve wether mongamy or polygamy is rule

"prosperous" "place" "practice" "themselves" "monogamy"

They used to be "prosperous" when the economy was almost 90%
aggrarian.

Not so today. Most of those multi-spousal "families" are nothing
more than multiple-dwelling groups where "dad" can stay tonight and
procreate yet another mouth to feed.

becuase they are forced into marginal land and into hiding to practice
what they se as a tenant of their faith

Chavez should file charges. Let due process work. BTW, that due
process was set up by evil religious people.

Ummm, where?

Not sure wher Pat is a resident, but in the state where Pat lives is a
good place to start

Guess you missed the point, Markie...

not at all

Absolutely at all.

I sure do

Chav has recourse to the courts if he wishs

cut