an Old friend wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
quoting you stevie
To which I will reply: ( 1. ) I wasn't there to verify the
participants at
the act of conception. If calling me a ******* makes you feel better,
then have
at it ( 2 ) I am a 9 time USMC Rifle Expert Mark. If I want
something
shot, even in Illinois, I will hit the target. One shot, one kill. I
don't
waste the govenments ammunition hitting targets that are not of
consequence.
YOU are not of ANY consequence that I am aware of, but situations ARE
subject
to change!
Unquote
the last sentence is particularly ilumanting
wrote:
wrote:
cut
---------------------
Brian said: "There never was an insinuation, Mr. Robeson. It was a
case of your misunderstanding and a dose of your wishful thinking."
Then Steve said: "I don't think that your previously archived comments
might be read that way. For an offense to have occured, it onl;y
requires that it be perceived as such."
--------------------
Steve only has to perceive a threat, but he says the rest of us have to
have the courts decide.
and therefore according to stevie as the one who received the threat I
decide if it was threatening
It would appear that way.
But there's always a double-standard at work in this newsgripe, so the
usual rules of logic don't always work.