"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Morris wrote:
Yes, the content has changed vastly: 1) His rhetoric has risen to
leading a conspiracy against the US governmnet, i.e. urging hams not to
follow FCC interpretation of Part 97 while urging them to follow his
construction,

well I hear alot any govt conspriay stuff ont he air these days

2) He now has a call in radio show, which may or may not
be violative,

not sure how but it would a change

3) He has involved himself and ham radio in many
instances of foreign policy, 4) There is now a commercial twist that
was never present in 1989, 5) He has begun defaming the man in charge
(Riley Hollingsworth], not present in 1989.

was not flaming others though in those days?

Even if his rule construction in certain aspects is correct and the
FCC's, incorrect, our system affords a way to handle that situation
through declaratory ruling in the administrative sector. None of us
has the right to urge others into non-compliance.

I could find a lot of people to disagree with you, there is a well
established (outside Ham radio) tradition of civl disobeince


Moreover, to defame
Riley Hollingsworth amounts to leading a conspiracy against our
government, because if we listen to Baxter, we're supposed to disregard
Hollingsworth, anti-thetical to a functioning Republic.

I'll have to pass that one onto Carl Rove with the suggestion that GW
start arresting his opponents for treason

Tieing into
his bulletins his Web Site, where he advertises money-making endeavors
is commercial, a Part 97 no-no.

but does the ARRL mention its website which certainly involved in
fundrasing and has links to comercail sitie

Supporting revolutions, such as the
one in Bougainville, clearly violates the Patriot Act, because none of
us can presume to do foreign policy, especially over ham radio.

Suporting govt change is NOT a violation of the patroit act.



This piece, not a complete analysis by any means, is but the tip of the
iceberg.

I thank you for it, but honestly I don't see anything beyond some
suggestions that Baxter might be best dealt by Mental health and not
the FCC. He seems to be not a nice person, but is not in and of itself
a rules violation


A sensible comment from 'an old friend'....again I am amazed....wait a
minute.....'an old friend' recognizing Glenn Baxter is in need of a rubber
room......right off the bat, eh? Perhaps a bit of experience 'old
friend'?

Dan/W4NTI