RadioBanter - View Single Post

September 14th 05, 11:01 AM

wrote:
From: on Sep 13, 8:50 pm

wrote:
From: on Sep 11, 3:45 am
wrote:
From: on Sep 8, 4:32 pm
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
From: on Sep 3, 1:55 pm
John Smith wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:23:26 -0700, N2EY wrote:
cut

Jimmie won't let it end. Nossir, he had to keep on arguing and
arguing and arguing and arguing that.

Nope. Gotta take it to the ARRL

I read Carl's webpage, astounded at the results.

The ARRL does *NOT* rule on free speech nor does Imlay's law
firm. Screum.
cut

See Carl's latest posting? He be blackballed.

Blackballed and a half by the Good Ol Boys at the League.

I rather suspected that the League hierarchy would find
some way to keep Carl down. His past and present doings
(NCI Executive Directorship) are NOT in line with what the
ARRL "leadership" wants.

I never thought that they would move so openly, I was wonderingif some
game might be playedd with the vote tailling

I've tried to point out some of the above for years, only
to be met by the Zealot BELIEVERS of the League who say
they can do nothing wrong. Obviously they've done something
wrong, even for a PRIVATE membership organization that can
toss out anyone they damn well want to. It seems, in Carl's
case, they did just that.

To think I had decided that if Carl won his race Id give the ARRL
another chance to earn my loyality
cut

You see the latest posting by Carl?

I sort of suspected something like that would happen. I didn't
expect
it would be so STRONG and PETTY though.

The "leadership" be entrenched and they LIKE being the
"leadership." As a PRIVATE membership organization they
can do anydamnthing they please. And it pleased them to
keep Carl OUT. So much for their alleged "democratic
principles" and "honest elections."

As a definite NON-member (no amateur radio license,
therefore no voting privileges in ARRL anything), all I
can say is that the actions of the ARRL are just
reprehensible.

What the League did was contrary to Dee's insistence that
"all should join and 'change it from within'" or something
to that effect. That's a non sequitur. If one can't get
IN, it be impossible to change a thing there. A sophistry.