This is like telling Moses to read those tablets again . . .

--
73/72, George
Amateur Radio W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas
Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13QE
"Starting the 58th year and it just keeps getting better!"






"Tom Bruhns" wrote in message
...
(Garvin) wrote in message
. com...

...
But i'd rather use what is called a directional coupler, and get
the
rho from that.

And of course you understand how directional couplers work, right?
Like I told you a while back, be sure it's calibrated to the line
you're measuring.

You need to hit the basic RF books a bit more, my friend.

So, Garvin, please understand this: the model I use for TEM
lines leads to results which are self-consistent and which
match experimental results with respect to all voltages,
currents and powers. It works with both steady-state and
transient conditions. It does all that independent of you
disagreeing, and independent of you calling people liars.
And you would have me forsake it for a model which is
inconsistent, which leads to voltages and/or currents at
the load end of the line which do not match the voltage and
current in the load? You would have me forsake it for a
model which leads to confusion about what's happening with
power, and which does not match what we measure
experimentally? Noooo, I don't think so. Have fun trying
to sort it all out, mon.

Cheers,
Tom