"bpnjensen" wrote in message
ups.com...
He needs to do something. There should be plenty of DX there, just
like there is
here.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

You might be surprised. From what I remember living on the East
Coast,
reception was much better there, with just a plain 50' wire attached
right to the antenna of the Astronaut-8 or the 1940's Zenith
Transoceanic - no transformer. Here in California, we get major
Pacific Rim stuff really well, but the rest of the world - even the
big
boys - are true DX. Europe is tough under all but the very best
circumstances. Even South America takes some work, and you'd think
they'd be easier (they *were* easier, from New England). Africa and
Central Asia, strangely, do better than Europe at certain times of
day,
but it still is heavily dependent on the perfect conditions for
intelligibility.

Another thing that I have to deal with is a noise level about 6
s-units
higher than rural New England ever was. David may have a comparable
problem. When I see posts from Telamon or Stewart McKenzie, I don't
usually see tough DX, but more likely powerhouses that can make it
over
the tough noise. Maybe they do tough DX, but their reports and
comments usually show more powerful stations. If I could away from
the
City, better results might be in the offing.

I've managed to get some pretty weak stations here at my suburban
QTH,
but it takes a lot of work and aspirin to get there. Maybe what
makes
a difference is whether your goal is to simply ID a station
positively
(which in itself can be a task), or to listen for content - IMO, far
more difficult. Spanish or Pidgin is a lot easier to understand
when
it is intelligible, of course.

I'd love to try my setup back at your place in MI. I bet I'd have a
lot better fortunes there, just as I did in New England.

Have you thought about going the loop antenna
route to cut down on the noise??

--Mike L.