On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:38:01 +0000 (UTC),
wrote:

Reg Edwards wrote:
I have not insisted, not even mentioned, that SWR can exist only on
50-ohm lines.

All I have said, somewhere, is that the usual SWR meter gives the
correct answers only on 50-ohm lines.
----
Reg.

If I connect a 100 Ohm antenna through a 100 Ohm transmission line to
a SWR meter designed for 50 Ohms and then to a transmitter which expects
a 50 Ohm load, does the meter read correctly with respect to the desired
transmitter loading?

Of course it does.

Jim, that seems inconsistent with your earlier statemetn "No, the SWR
being measured is on the load side of the meter."

In the example you quoted with a 100 ohm load on a 100 ohm line, were
the line loss low, and the line long enough to be sure to sample a
fully developed voltage maximum and voltage minimum it would be found
that the VSWR was 1:1.

Yet we would expect the "SWR meter designed for 50 Ohms" to which it
is connected (on the load side) to read VSWR=2:1, so is it measuring
the SWR on the load side of the meter as you earlier stated?

Perhaps typical SWR meters are actually sampling current and voltage
on a very short section (almost a point sample) of transmission line
that is part of the instrument, and they are indicating what the
observed SWR would be on an extended line of that type, provided that
attenuation was insignificant, and that the extended line was
sufficiently long to allow full development of the standing wave
pattern.

The inference of what is happening on adjacent line is ours, not the
instruments, as demonstrated by your example above.

Owen
--