"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...
Ken Taylor wrote:
wrote in message
...

On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:19:42 -0400, Ari Silversteinn
wrote:


DHS has proposed a change in scenario. They want an on locomotive
alerting
system that could be commandeered and driven at, near or about a
disaster
site. Everything else stays more or less the same, overbroadcasting on
local AM/FM, power off the locomotive, selective or full frequency
broadcasting, train (s) to be in motion at all times. 20-30 second
messages
that would also combine a message to be aware that a locomotive (at
speed)
will be flying by the at grade crossings.

Comments?

Tracks across Lake Ponchartrain fell in.

Granted they were put back in service faster than anything the
government had connection to.


Why a loco anyway? It would appear to be the mistaken assumption that
anything that big must have power to burn on anything plugged in by a
user. Not the case - the power from a loco is, not surprisingly, applied
to the tracks. The electric generators used for powering gear other than
the train's vitals are not high power.

Guys, don't ya know that this guy is trolling and caught way more than the
daily creel limit?

- Mike KB3EIA -

Well, he's not a troll in that he's making it up as he goes - it appears he
really is hoping to do for his company what he says (source: Google).

However it's a job which really equates to:
Government fleeces tax-payers
Bureaucrat gets hold of budget allocation
Bureaucrat needs to succeed - ie. unload allocation
Ari and co. want to be under the hopper when the jackpot payout commences

A valid way of doing business, but still a crock.

Ken