nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
nobodys_old_friend wrote:
Dr.Ace - WH2T wrote:

Freedom of speech means I have the right to say if I think someone's posts
are ignorant, stupid, or just plain wrong.

your point? if any

you clearly don't respect the rights of others to disagree with you

so you talk the talk, but when you going to walk the walk?

So...

Work keeps me out of RRAP for a couple of weeks and I "return" only
to find those who accuse me of certain things being waist-deep in it
themselves.

what are you talking about? another hurricane relief mission Stevie

Guess you weren't paying attention to references, were you, Mark?

And I can see your English comprehension skills have not
improved.

no they haven't but then they are pretty good

No, they are not.

The above quoted paragraph is evidence thereof.

cuting the rep

You mean conducting censorship.

What part of the concept of "work" do you not understand?

work wasn't the subject but then you can't read

Sure I can read.

I said: "Work keeps me out of RRAP for a couple of weeks and I
"return" only to find those who accuse me of certain things being
waist-deep in it themselves."

You said: "what are you talking about? another hurricane relief
mission Stevie"

Therefore you've opened your mouth, allowed the REAL "bs" of this
NG to spew forth again, and then rused to get your shoes off so you
could dance barefoot in it for a while.

No, I was not talking about hurricaine releif, although we are
seeing plenty of dislocated folks in my ER in the last 3 weeks.

BTW, Mark, He DID clearly "respect" your right to "disagree" with
you...He just called your posts for what they (usually)
are..."ignroant, stupid, or just plain wrong" and YOU were the one with
the "disagreement" issues...Again.

you haven't been reading the man's posts he doesn't respect people's
right to disagree, he like you resorts to name calling

And you're any different?

One he was the subject so stop diverting it

I'm not diverting anything.

You're showing exactly NO difference, Mark...

again go read some of stuff first

I did. Lot's of it.

And what I see is that YOU are perpetrating the exact same deceit,
misconduct and verbal trashing of the NG you accuse others of.

Both of you confuse disagreement with stupidity, meaning neither of you
repsect the rights of other to disagree

"respect"

Sure I do. That you're alive despite several years of whining
about death threats is proof positive that I "respect disagreement".

not at all but you don't know the meaning of the word proof as you have
amply proven over the years

Sure I do. I've provided lots of it.

And everytime I DO, someone such as yourself wants something ELSE
as "proof".

If you and spineless creeps like Frankie of Silliland want to play
on that merry-

His "point" was that he clearly shares the same opinion as other
educated and informed men about YOUR "points".

gee where are these men and only men you say

Certainly not in Michigan.

vague as is normal for you

and evasive as ever

Not evasive or vague at all. I am saying none of the men he's
refering to are in Michigan.

As for "talking the talk but not walking the walk", when are we
gonna see you in "uniform", "Colonel"...?!?!

more nonsense Stevie

Not at all.

You claim to be a veteran AND an Officer to boot.

Obviously NONE of it true, ergo you're talking the talk, but can't
walk the walk.

Obviously? gee then why do I have a DD 214 with my name on it

I have a picture of a "Hollywood Star" with my name on it too,
Mark...Nice for gags.

but you can't deal with issues that alwasy your problem

"always"

Sure I can.

when you going to start then

Already have.

At least the countless spelling lessons I gave you appear to have
paid off.

bull####

Nope. I only had to correct you twice in this post, none in the
previous. Obviously it's worn off.

meaning you claim is in fact bull#### as I said

Nope. I believe you are suffering from the "anger" aspect of
newsgroup psoting that Lennie refers to. Obviously, in your case, it
works.

And you were doing sooooooooooooooooo good.

and back to disrespecting intelectual porperty again

If you're going to refer to intellectual ANYthing, please spell it
correctly.

"intellectual" "property"

There's nothing of YOURS that even remotely approaches
"intellectual property", Mark.

Steve, K4YZ