RadioBanter - View Single Post

October 7th 05, 11:59 AM

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K=D8HB wrote:
wrote

It's a problem when Len posts off-topic

Maybe a problem for you, but it's not a problem for me! I don'=
t call Len down
for being OT.

I just wonder where all the crying hams went that usually call do=
wn Len
for being off topic?

Most of the "crying" about "calling" Lennie for being "off top=
ic"
usually follows one of HIS diatribes wherein HE expends a lot of hot
air and mularkey about what constitutes a propper topic for the
newsgroup.

Ah, yes. Lennie "asks for it." Typical stuff from abusers.

He doesn't "ask for it"...He just get's in kind what he delivers.

Hi!

Hello yourself.

The same sort of spin he generates about others pretending to =
be
"moderator" immediately followed by his pontifications about what HE
perceives as being "appropriate" for discussion.

Strange. I most often read about him being off-topic.

I am sure your scope or reference is a bit myoptic.

And yours is "At least for a short time, a quality of vividness and
clarity of focus in our public discourse..."

Hi!

I already said hello. Memory a bit short, Brian?

Are those radio-telephone crafts?

Yes, as a matter of fact a large part of the recovery work invo=
lves restoring
microwave and cellular radio infrastructure. If you have skill=
s in those areas,
you might investigate the opportunity.

I think Len does. Probably what's keeping him off rrap.

Leonard H Anderson has no interest whatsoever in being part a=
nd
parcel of ANY kind of "public service" work. Lennie's absence is no
doubt due to yet another of his "trips".

How would you know? Are you watching and following Len?

Nope, but that's HIS "standard response".

Right.

We agree....Gee...put THIS day on tha calender!

BTW, Brian, Lennie has publically stated that his last "public
service" effort had to do with the filling of sandbags in
1970-something...His words...Not mine.

Besides...What is needed at present are not "design engineers"
(which is what Lennie CLAIMS to be)...but installers and technicians
(jist as the thread title suggests) to get the new sites up and
running. The technology has already been "set", and each site, oth=
er
than local terrain, is exactly the same as the one next to it. Just
add water and shake.

Strange. I recall Len saying that he had been trained by the US Army
in microwave communications.

You need to re-orient yourself, Brian...

I'm Quitefine in my orientation.

No, you're not.

That was "microwave communications" in the FIFTIES, which bore
absolutely NO resemblence with current "microwave communications".

Gotta love you amateur geniuses always trying to change the physics of
radio in your laughable attempts to discredit Len. Too bad for you.

Do some research on the state of "technology" in 1953 as compared
to today, Brian, to include what was considered "microwave" then as
opposed to today.

Except for perhaps West Point, Army
training is technical in nature; training personnel in the
installation, operation, and maintenance of equipment.

Uh huh...And the "equipment" Lennie was "trained" on required a
walk-in closet to facilitate.

Sounds like many a radio room at the base of a communications tower.

I can do with the stuff on my desktop most of what Lennie claims
he could do in 1953. I'd say that's a bit of a change.

His design experience came later, so Len is actually qualified to do
both.

He's designed nothing. Not one thing. He's BOASTED of being a
"design engineer" for years, and frequently drops the names of projects
whose names appeared in Aviation Week and Space Technology.

You might find some of the systems that I worked on in the Bulletin of
the American Meteorological Societs (BAMS). Have you never worked on
anything worth appearing in a professional publication?

Yep.

But we weren't talking about you, me or meteorological systems,
now were we?

His only "radio" reference, other than being a radio mechanic at
ADA, is the SINCGARS program...A program absolutely irrelevent to
Amateur Radio, but he sure does make sure we hear about it.

And you can't remember the common or technical nomeclature of teh radio
systems that you claim to have used in the USMC.

No...I don't DISCUSS military radios here, Brian. I have NEVER,
not ONCE said "I don't remember"...

That's a LennieSpin. And when repeated by him or you, is a lie.

How is it that you
can remember the name of a system that Len worked on? I guess the
purpose of repititious postings has finally had an effect.

To the point of nausea.

However SINCGARS was NEVER an Avionics system. Nor was it
intended to be.

That bad, bad Len being qualified to do both! Gosh, he must have
decided early in life to lay the foundation to bust all of your rants.
Very inciteful, that Len.

That he managed to do enough to get paid and not so mcuh as to
muck up what ever program he was working on at the time are his ONLY
"contributions" to "radio"

You don't even know the radio systems that you claim to have used, yet
you know that Len has mucked up every program that he has worked on?

Who SAID I don't now them?

Something is really, really wrong with your claims, Steve.

No, Brian, something is very, VERY wrong with your's and Lennie's
stories about them.

Of course too we presently have reams and reams of "front page"
media singing the praises of the Amateur Radio service being able to
"get through" when nothing else can, completely contrary to Lennie's
rhetoric of the past 8 years...

It's such a shame that our professionals waste millions and millions =
of
dollars each year installing, maintaining, and upgrading emergency
comms when a couple of overweight, senior cit hams can lay them all to
waste. Why do they even bother?

Huh? Is Mark Morgan ghost writing for you now?

Itme, itme mispeeeling agin?

Must be awfully embarrassing for him. But it's not the first
itme.

Such a big ego must cause you some embarassment from itme to itme,
tooey.

It's not my "ego" we're discussing...It's Lennie's.

I've just discussed your ego, tooey.

No, it's not.

Steve, K4YZ