Quote:
Originally Posted by
But with all due respect, how do we know your scorecard is accurate?
Does anyone check your work? You do make mistakes, Len. We've seen some
of them here.
Also, it's clear to anyone who reads your posts here that you're hardly
unbiased on the subject of code testing.
Indeed, you used the phrase "unbiased by local groups' opinions on
morsemanship as either vital or neccessary [sic] in amateur radio" as
if *others* scorecards are somehow biased - but not yours. You've
previously accused others of 'massaged numbers' and 'fraud' when their
data did not match yours, too.
So why should anyone *assume* the accuracy of your scorecard, Len? I'm
not saying you're intentionally cooking the books.....
|
No, you're not actually SAYING he's cooked the books (you're too slippery to make a blunt statement) but you're certainly spotlighting the possibility.
If Anderson was too "cook the books", do you really think the score would be nearly an even tie between the two camps (about 55:45 at last tabulation)?
Grow up.
The Man in the Maze
QRV from Baboquivari Peak, AZ