isn't the power rule about input?
sam

--
toys:
diesel BMW motorcycle, homebuilt electric motorcycle, gold wing trike, honda
gyros, dodge diesel dualie, fiat osca 1500 cabriolet,
W3CYO/R, 145.49, 224.40, 443.300 mhz. repeaters.


"Art Unwin KB9MZ" wrote in message
m...
"William E. Sabin" sabinw@mwci-news wrote in message
...
artie wrote:

The Bird is a wonderful, stable design that's simple and well
understood. You can get fancier (from Bird, among others), you can
get
more accurate (my old HP), but it's hard to get simpler.

I use a homebrew directional coupler (see QEX for
March 1995) for everyday use, and a brand new,
well preserved (in a closet) Bird 43 as a
reference instrument. At full scale it is specifed
as accurate within +/- 0.5 db, which is plenty
good enough for me.

Bill W0IYH

Why would a ham operator have a need for such accuracy ?
Isn't consistency enough ? For ensurance of not exceeding
the power output for those who want to equal the max then
a scope would be the way to go. For those that build then
there is a need for accuracy and bragging rights are fully
earned. Seems like this falls into the same catagory of
'I have six elements where you have only five'
Art