View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old November 5th 04, 07:56 PM
Mike Knudsen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(William Donzelli) writes:

Seriously, to those that have never seen and RAA (or RAB), a first
glance at the innards will leave you stunned. Never again will you see
such overengineering.


Wow. I had an RAK (IIRC) VLF Navy set, that I could pick up by myself back
then. It was over-engineered enough -- inductors and a tuning cap that looked
like a KW antenna tuner. The separate PS had a ballast bulb that looked like
something out of a searchlight. And it worked great -- WWVB any time of the
day, and who knows how many useless encrypted Navy RTTY stations.

But even it couldn't get that Swedish station, from the Midwest. I traded it
for an HF boatanchor rx.

I wish I could get it - I have an RAB-2 (the HF brother to the RAA)
that needs company.


I'd have loved to get the RAL, the regenerative HF brother to the RAK. I have
never operated such a smooth regeneration control as what that RAK had -- you
could peak it for max AM sens and select, or just drop it in to hear weak CW.
Would be fun on HF.
73, Mike K.


Oscar loves trash, but hates Spam! Delete him to reply to me.