View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 17th 03, 04:44 AM
Crazy George
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron:

Because lightning is a difficult process to study, you will find that the
references change with time, as more is learned. Blue jets and red sprites
come to mind, for example. One startling example is the National Fire
Protection Agency Lightning Protection Code. The one I used and became
familiar with in the 80s and early 90s was withdrawn and canceled when it
was understood that some of the premises on which it was based were simply
wrong. The new code, which has finally been released, is very different
from the previous one. I no longer have current references to this
discipline available, but I suggest reading the recent issues of Journal of
Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, and Journal of Geophysical Research for
more up to date information than an old textbook. The fact is that the
phenomenon you cite does not bleed off anywhere near enough charge to make
any difference. Yes, it does drain off charge. No, the quantity is like
trying to empty the ocean with a leaky coffee can.

--
Crazy George
Remove NO and SPAM from return address
"Ron" wrote in message
...
I am considering connecting a coil from the base of my vertical antenna

to
ground, not for impedance matching, but to allow the charge on the

ground to
slowly leak off at the top of the antenna. I will also use a lightning

arrestor but wonder if this additional step will further reduce the

chance of a
lightning strike.


About a week ago I posted the above message. Several people responded and

there
was a general feeling that the idea of allowing a gradual leak off of

charge at
the top of the antenna would not prevent or even be likely to reduce the

chance
of a lightning strike.

Tonight I was looking through my old "Elements of Physics" by Shortly and
Williams, fourth edition, page 697 and came across the following

statement:

"The action of a well-grounded and sharply pointed lightning rod is primar

ily to
discharge quietly into the air the charge that is induced in the

surrounding
earth by a charged thundercloud above. The electric intensity in the

vicinity of
the sharp point is high enough to break down the immediately surrounding

air and
the continual discharge prevents building up sufficient voltage over the

whole
cloud-to-ground path to break down this long path and give rise to a

stroke of
lightning at this location."

Comments?

Ron, W4TQT