RadioBanter - View Single Post - how a policy issue for a change...local bandplaning

October 19th 05, 05:59 PM

wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 05:05:49 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 04:45:07 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

wrote:

KØHB wrote:

"an Old friend" wrote

I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example

???????????????????????

Hans appears incapable.

Try your local frequency coordinating body, perhaps the repeater
coordinating body for 6M, if that is your interest. Each state or
locality is different.

Not for 6m AM, SSB or CW it isn't.

No? Every state and locality can be different.

For 6m AM, SSB and CW? You're simply incorrect.

more pronoucement from on High

you make the assertion explain why

Follow the url I posted for the ARRL band plans. Read them. We can
discuss it when you're educated.

I have

nothing is stated that says CW SSB or AM are somehow not subject to
adjustment or local (or repgional) varriation, indeed the ARRL would
lack the power to say that

Don't tell me what it doesn't say, Mark. Tell me what it says. It
doesn't say anything about ending world hunger, saving the whales or any
number of things. Six meters frequently opens for regional QSOs and
even worldwide QSOs. Tell me what negative consequences there might be
for a national band plan if guys in Podunk, Iowa began implementing a
local band plan.

your assertion you back it up

What was my assertion, Mark? That you go to the ARRL band plan url and
read it?

don't be your normal lazy bum self and tell others to do your work for
you do it

That is *precisely* what you repeatedly ask others to do for you. You
ask questions about a topic of which you know little. You're provided
information or are pointed to where the information can be found (which
you haven't troubled yourself to find and study on your own). You begin
disputing the information. It is the question of the 5 MHz frequencies
all over again.

You don't use a spell checking program because you can't be bothered, so
you continue to post gibberish and to tell readers that it is their
problem. If you want to see a lazy guy, stare into a mirror.

One size does not fit
all. Read your ARRL repeater guide. Notice all the caveats wrt band
plans, coordination, and even spacing.

Those are regional differences, not local ones. What does the repeater
guide say about 6m AM operation?

Do you know of any 6m AM repeaters
anywhere?

Do you know why there can't be?

There is no reason that my house can't be chartreuse...but it isn't.

Do you know of any 6m AM repeaters? Just one will get you off the hook.

which matters how

no reason a 6m Am repeater can be built.

No reason it can be built? Did you mean "can't be built". Read my
comments above.

you understand the question so answer rather than evade, lazy bum

The lazy bum was the guy who wrote it incorrectly and posted it without
correction.

I know Riley was going on about a 2m AM repeater at one point

Great. There've been AM repeaters on 5m, 6m and 2m in the past. I know
of none at the present. Were you and the boys in the club going to
start a 6m AM repeater?

which mean you knoew of them? which means your point was what?

I "knoew" of them? I know a lot of things, Mark. My point was exactly
what I asked you: Do you know of any 6m AM repeaters in existence in
the United States of America?

you are about as myopic as Stevie

I'm sure it seems that way to a lazy dyslexic.

Dave K8MN