On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:48:03 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:
wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 04:52:41 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
cut
not at all
I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks
would go about local band planing
It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis.
It can be on vhf and above frequencies. You just need to open your
mind a little, a very little.
It can't be done locally if there is any chance of interfering with
other regional repeaters.
more pronucements from on high
the MM's have spoken
Not "pronucements", Mark, but "pronouncements". With which of my
statements do you disagree?
all of them
you advance the notion that nothing can be if the is ANY chance of
interference.
That statement is a load of ****
nothing say anything like that
If you are coordinating to avoid putting your
local machine with one 50 or 75 miles away, you aren't dealing with
local band planning. You're dealing with regional band planning.
not according to the ARRL you are being pretty certain about the
meaning of words
I understand that the concept might be alien to a guy who has trouble
with words. Yes, I'm generally pretty certain about the meaning of
words. That is a tool which has served me well.
do publish the dictionary of the words you choose to make up new
meanings for
it might help
but then I forgot you can't be helpfull or constructive can you?
the ARRL says local bandplaning is possible
Not "bandplaning", Mark, but "band planning".
shve the distintion up your ass
Quote the material. I
provided you a url to the ARRL band plans. Nothing is mentioned about
local band planning.
I am quote the text PRINTED by the ARRL
but then when you see fit the ARRL lies
Now, what do your comments have to do with 6m AM operation?
why does it have to?
...because you brought it up.
no I did not
the subject was Bandplaning you myopicaly choose to focus on an
example to exclusion of all other examples or posiiblities
I know asking you to think is asking you to exceed your abilities, but
I never asked you in particular to jump.
now that you have you might try being constructive
or not of course as you choose
the topic was local band planing as described in the ARRL repeater
guide as possible
"Band planning", Mark. Please provide some evidence that the ARRL
endorses local band plans. Feel free to demonstrate that you have any
knowledge at all of band planning anywhere, any time.
Dave K8MN
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account