Mike Coslo wrote in
:
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:41:58 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:23:24 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
cutns?
Strange. I read about the PCTA's being ill mannered and rude. I
do find
in practice however, that the NCTA's and interested others are the
ones telling people to keep their mouth shut.
yea we advocate against harrassment one of the worst forms of
rudeness
Procders complain that other excercising there free speech is somehow
infringing on their own
So I guess what you are saying is that your cause is so righteous
that
you are justified in squelching the other side?
no effort to squech it has been made. he has the right to ignore me if
he likes, as do you of course, and I have the right to tell to shut
up and stoping acting like High Inqusitor or impling that Len is doing
something imporper in reading and counting as he sees fit
How many hunderd question does Jim need to ask before he reconizes
that Len is not required to answer him
or when wil Jim realize there has not been a grand inquistitor
apponointed eith for Ham radio or RRAP
People that tell other people to shut up are acting like grand
inquisitors.
A lot of people on the no-code side don;t like Jim because he
generally
keeps his cool, and puts forth pretty good arguments.
- Mike KB3EIA -
On the contrary, I like Jim because he is rational and polite. I don't have
to agree with him, though. He did raise a valid point about citizenship,
i.e. it is irrelevant, but I raised this point myself with Len before and
didn't get an answer.
Any way you look at it though, more than half the comments are in favour of
the NPRM and less than a third against, the rest being divided into those
who want a code test retained for the Extra and those who otherwise fall in
the middle ground. The FCC will have no problem deciding that they have a
mandate to abolish Element 1 based on the comments.
So we are all just waiting for the other shoe to drop.
73 de Alun, N3KIP