RadioBanter - View Single Post - Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235

October 27th 05, 03:05 AM

wrote:
On 26 Oct 2005 18:03:12 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 22 Oct 2005 05:51:41 -0700, wrote:
wrote:
On 21 Oct 2005 20:05:26 -0700, wrote:
wrote:

grow up

What does that mean in this context?

in this context it means either do your own countor shut up

Why? Is Len's count somehow sacred, and not open to any
questions?

no

but he does npt have to answer any questions

"not"

Then to NOT clarify his work is to admit that it's not prepared in
any remotely scientific manner, which is to say that it's just a lot of
bufoonery.

not at all

Sure it is!

it more a matter of thinking the questioners to be buffons

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHYAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

"...to be buffons..."

BBWWWHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

cut
Len is under no obligation to answer your questions of anyone
else if he chooses not

That's right. But if he ignores questions on how his numbers
were derived, why should we accept those numbers as valid?

then don't accept them as valid

But why?

Lennie went to a lot of effort to make these posts in order to
validate his points.

but not to you or jim

Sure he did...He posted them to a public forum.

Why then would he NOT want anyone to understand his "work"...?!?!

why should he care if you understand his work?

If he wants to "make his point" he'd clarify his work.

Otherwise all he's doing is spamming the NG.

you are not interested in facts you never have been

Sure I am.

And when you PRESENT some, I will pay close attention,
COLONEL.....

Len isn't the only one counting the comments, btw.

Is that not allowed?

apeartly len chooses to exercise his right to state by his
refusal to answer to make exactly that determination

??

Are you saying that if Len doesn't answer questions,
then I don't have the right to ask questions?

never siad you lacked the right

"said"

No...You didn't "say" it...You just told Jim to shut up.

yes I did

Then you acted to coerce him into supressing his speech.

So here we have your voluntary admission of your wanton violation
of Jim's civil rights...No grey area here...You did it!

i told he wasn't going to get his answers and he should stop going on
about it

But if he wants to ask the question 10,000 times in 10,000 threads,
it IS his RIGHT to do so...

never sadi he did not have the right to ignore that request

"said"

You DID try to suppress Jim's freedom of speech.

cuttng the raving of the nutjob

The nutjob is in Chassell, Michigan. But I am not yet sure if
it's you or the guy you're sleeping with........

Steve, K4YZ