View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old October 27th 05, 07:33 PM
Steve Nosko
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wideband RF blocking

A resistor alone has also been used. I have used a combination of L & R and
L with ferrite beads as well.
While the 500 ohm (10:1) guideline is a good one, teh impedance can drop
well below that before causing trouble.

ALso, the suggestion of the resistor to "dampen" a resonance is valid. You
can take the choke above self resonance this way (self resonant freq can be
in the upper part of your freq range). In the past, chokes were specially
wound to raise the self resonant freq, but for this range, I suspect there
isn't much help there.
73, Steve, K,9.D;C'I

P.S.
Paralleling caps and series'ing inductors is generally frowned upon. If
needed, parallel caps are usually separated by a bead or resistor. I've not
seen series chokes used.


"Joel Kolstad" wrote in message
...
In a receiver, for wideband (10-150MHz) biasing of a MMIC amplifier using
inductors between the RF trace and the power rails, I'm finding that a

single
inductor tends not to work so well due to (1) wanting a largish inductor

(say,
one with 500 ohms of reactance at 10MHz in a 50 ohm system -- 8uH) but

(2)
not going beyond the self-resonant frequency of the inductor, which of

course
is smaller the larger the inductance (that 8uH inductor might typically

have
an SRF of 50MHz, noticeably below the 150MHz I'm trying to achieve RF

blocking
to!).

Is there a better means of providing wideband DC biasing/RF blocking than

just
placing a large and small inductor in series? I've run SPICE simulations

of
this, and -- just as when you stack multiple capacitors in parallel for

wider
RF coupling -- there are significant anti-resonances that drop the overall
reactance of the pair of inductors to much less than 500 ohm (even less

than
50 ohms!) unless you're very careful in the choice of individual inductor
SRFs, inductances, etc.

Thanks,
---Joel Kolstad