Thread
:
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
View Single Post
#
45
October 30th 05, 04:03 PM
[email protected]
Posts: n/a
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On 28 Oct 2005 19:35:45 -0700,
wrote:
wrote:
On 28 Oct 2005 18:55:32 -0700,
wrote:
wrote:
Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children
VOTING in elections!
I don't know who "Jimmie-James" is supposed to be, Len. But I'm
not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed
to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.
Jim in answering the post I am afraid you just lied above
Where?
Hot ham handled that for me he is right
I'll just you were being dense to need it
Len uses multiple names in his posts. I'm not sure who he means by
"Jimmie-James". Is it me, or Jim Weir (who posts as "RSTEngineering")
or somebody else?
If he means me, *why* can't he just call me Jim, or N2EY?
And it's a fact that I'm not "all for children VOTING in elections".
I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio
license.
Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state
drivers' licenses...
I don't think it's okay for children to have driver's
licenses. I'm
just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license.
and Len supports the notion at this point
Why?
he has explained his reasoning over the years I agree there is
something to it
Can he or anyone else supply *ANY* evidence that the lack of
an age requirement has had *any* negative effects on the amateur
radio service?
I doubt it he points out a peotencail bad effect but one that seems
not to be problem
We've had licensed amateur radio in the USA for 93 years now. In all
that time there has *never* been an age requirement. So if
the lack of an age requirement is a problem, there should be
plenty of evidence by now. Yet Len provides no evidence, but
wants an age requirement of 14 years for anyone to have a US amateur
license.
If you look at FCC enforcement letters, the age of the worst
offenders is much closer to Len's age than to 14 years....
I neither support nor oppose such a notion,
Why don't you oppose it?
for the same reason I don't oppose voice testing before the voice
modes, there is no serious proposal on the table to do anything about
it
It's a completely unnecessary
requirement for a license. No evidence has been presented
to support it.
just like code testing which is why the later is likely out of the
service very soon
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com
to open account
Reply With Quote