View Single Post
  #20   Report Post  
Old November 3rd 05, 01:07 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default pinging Len Brain Todd and Frank

On 1 Nov 2005 13:48:53 -0800, wrote:

From: on Oct 31, 5:36 pm

wrote:
Hi folks I am moving against Stevie have talked to TN Nursing Borad
and they are snding me a form and asking I forward material I can
gather


Len and Frank, I was asked to provide addresses for those that will be
mentioned in the various posts. I would be gratefull if you provide
this in private email to me or publicly posting your refusual


Brain, and Todd I'll have your address (and any other hams by
reference to QRZ if you like feel free to provide a prefered method
for contact should the nursing borad choose to follow up


That should be BRIAN as in Brian Burke, but Mark keeps on
with Dudly the Imposter's deliberate misspelling... :-(


no I just blow it on my own from time to time

My USPS address has been on dozens of bylines in Ham Radio
magazine and in dozens of ECFS filings at the FCC. It is
no secret. I don't need either pseudonyms nor fantasy
pasts to express myself, here or anyplace else.


I don't think so.

Steve has been warned away from visiting my home, and that's good
enough for me at this time.

His anti-everything comments are public record. Ditto his paranoid
"liar behind every tree" fantasy. Google provides.


Thousands of his postings are intact on Google.


more than 8000 BTW

Dudly doesn't realize those are evidence of HIS fantasies.


Being the prolific poster that he is, he's probably made hundreds if
not thousands of posts from his employers computers. If they don't
already know what kind of idiot they have on "thier" hands by now they
never will.


There's two takes on that. One, this newsgroup doesn't involve
the medical profession anywhere. As such, it doesn't apply to
any state medical licensing board. Two, such a medical board
may not concern themselves with anyone's background.


wellStevie has said they will pull someone license for lying outside
medical areas, the State of tenneesee agrees while adding that some
type of fine is more likely

There have been a few cases of deranged nurses who have
killed patients, one last year in the east. The one most
familiar to me is Elfren Saldivar, the convicted "mercy killer"
at a Glendale, CA, hospital, an anesthiology-specialist nurse
there; he had injected several elderly patients with some kind
of fatal dose "to ease their suffering." That Glendale hospital
had NOT done a good background check on Saldivar and could not
see that he had done similar things at another hospital.

Mark is on his own.

Of course I am which is fine

Back a few years, some anony-mousie tried to
intimidate me publicly, saying he would be "in my neighborhood"
at a certain period of time and wanted to "discuss things" with
me in person. I printed up a large collection of that individual's
postings, showing their full Internet routing, had a talk with the
Foothill Division of the LAPD (who got that packet). My wife and
I proceded to go up north to Washington to visit (scheduled long
before that message exchange happened) while this individual was
in the general area. The LAPD has had a "stalking" detail for a
few years now after several incidents (and one fatality) of
stalkers attacking their victims. While we were gone, this
individual had tried telephoning me but got only our answering
machine. Telephone company security office was informed and they
apparently checked that out, both from the Caller ID info I had
and the tape of the recorded message. The "stalker" had called
from an unlisted number in the southern part of Greater Los
Angeles, the best info I could get legally from the telephone
company...never got close to where my residence was. I don't
know what the LAPD did...they did some investigation but one
can't get details on such if no overt crime had been committed.

The pseudo-macho types who try intimidation on computers only
fool themselves. They don't understand that their "victims"
can assemble a great deal of information on intimidators before
anything goes down. Such would be excellent evidence of intent
if they were nuts enough to try any physical violence of any
kind. Worse (for them) is that it gives their target advance
warning which could result in a very rude surprise for them
when they do try something.


indeed



_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account