Roy Lewallen wrote:

It's simple, yet too complicated for you to actually do it and show us.

Over the years, I had the unfortunate experience to occasionally meet an
engineer for whom everything was very simple. They could never
understand why it took the rest of us so long to solve all those really
trivial problems. But after watching these folks in action for a while,
I noticed that they were somehow never able to actually produce any
hardware that actually worked. When pressed, they were very skilled at
working themselves into a spot where they wouldn't ever have to actually
deliver a working device, changing groups, projects, or responsibilities
whenever they got too close to actually having to deliver. One common
ploy was to regard the mere creation of a working model beneath their
dignity and an unworthy use of their great knowledge.

Surely you're not one of those, are you?

Nope, I accept your model and point out the conceptual error you made.
Probably in grammer school, you were taught to collect like terms. Why
are you so dead set against performing that simple necessary math function?

You say "the real power that would be calculated for the incident wave
alone" is the forward power but Chipman does ***NOT*** say that! In fact,
he says there is additional interaction (interference power) that must be
taken into account when Z0 is complex.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----