K4YZ wrote:
stole from old friend wrote:

more violationof of property right

K4YZ wrote:
raped an old friend wrote:
violation of Proety right by K4YZ

What's a "Proety right"...?!?!

There's no such thing.

K4YZ wrote:
raped_by_an_old_friend wrote:
You didn't correct Brian and tell him that Steve did not prescribe
medicine, did you?

no I did not

nor do I feel there is anything to correct

so why should try

But that's NOT what you said in OTHER posts, Markie!

I never said I felt there was anything to corect in any other post
Stevie

"correct"

But that's not what you suggested in the previous post.

what post and what are you talking about?

Every recent post in which you suggest that I "prescribed"
medication.

And you substantiated that in the very post that you've now thrice
quoted.

There's not a single word in anything I've said that violates
either the Nurse Practice Act OR the Medical Practice Act of the
State of Tennessee...or any OTHER state, for THAT matter!

it does violate the regs posted for LPN by the BoN of TN

Nope.

sure seems to

What "seems" to you is nothing more than your inappropriate
interpretation of something you HOPE you can use against me.

The truth is something different.

Keep dreaming, Markie.

not dreaming

Actually, DAYdreaming is more appropriate.

nothing concerning is dream, a nightmare prehaps never a dream

Again, you leave words out, disorganize others, and the meaning is
lost.

How does your imprecision with words become my splitting of hairs?

no imprecision with word occoured therefore of course that is not what
became your spliting of hairs

Yes, a very OBVIOUS "imprecision" occured!

where?

that I choose not to dispute that others may form different opinion
than mine?

No, from your imprecison with the written word.

what imprecision are you refering to?

Your assinine attempt to suggest my "take an Ativan" comment was
an attempot to prescribe a medicine.

As for what may be a "different opinion" or what is just jibberish,
who's to tell?

me for one

How can you tell?

Your English comprehension skills, in a word, suck. Your grammar
is worse.

cut
yes

Then you're even more confused than you first appeared to be....

prehaps

"perhaps"

No "prehaps" to it...You're confused.

another stevie lie

How can THAT be? YOU have suggested that you ARE confused! You
even requoted it right here!

obviously I don't think so but you may be right

There's no "may be" to it.

yet another lie

Again, how can it be? YOU suggested that I am right, and even
quoted it in your OWN post! Both of these examples simply substantiate
my opinion that you ARE confused!

Your past fabrications
regarding your military service and lies on numerous other topics,

what lies on other topics?

my lies conering my rank I can easily explain, and were obviously legal
enough that dispite the fact Stevie claims to have reported the matter
to the DoD no action was taken

Lying about being a Field Grade commissioned officer is NOT legal
under ANY circumstances, save perhaps for obvious theatrical
performances.

as was the case those years ago

as I said it was clearly legal enough since the DoD did nothing in
response to your complaints

That the DoD has better things to do than intervene in a USENET
exchange is one thing.

meaning they found legal enough not to bother with, exactly as I said

Not as you said.

People "break laws" every day without being cited or prosecuted
for them...But that does NOT legitimize their infractions.

yep you would certainly know about that Stevie

Nope.

cuting steve being nonresponive

What's "nonresponive"...?!?!?

yes I can since they can no longer file charges, and never choose to
file them espite your infroming them

"chose" "despite" "informing"

That they dismiss you as the nutcase you are does not lefitimize
breaking the law. It just means you're probably THAT insignificant...

Stevie it means as a matter of law I am inocent of the offense

You are only innocent of an offense when so adjudicated by the
court.

I am inocent of any crime any crime til proved guilty

get over it

Get over what? That you're a liar and deceiver?

respect the rule of law

The law has not "ruled" here.

I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago

And they ALSO get people "confessing" to be JFK's assassin, to
have been abducted by aliens and hundreds of other crank and obviously
mentally inadequate states of mind ever year.

so?

So it puts you into that pile.

still makes me an innocent man

No, it means you've not had your day in court.

an innocent man that you hound despite the legal facts of the case

There are no "legal facts" until the evidence has been submitted
to a court and deemed valid. So far that's not happened.

No doubt you made the list.

That you would "call and confess" only made you look more idiotic!

but it legaly would start the clock on the staute of limitations

"legally" "statute"

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

right

Uh huh.

Thanks!

for what?

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

I guess your ignorance really DOES know no bounds!

and you refuse to enlighten me

I've been trying...Lord knows I've been trying, as have dozens of
others.

You're beyond being "enlightened"...Sooooooooooooooooooo far
beyond!

your
ideas on sexual fun--you don't think those might lessen your credibility?

the State of TN requires that I not recieve any discrimination based on
my sexuality so yes I expect that Tennesse to obey its own rules

Hot flash, Hot Rod...No prosecutable act of discrimination has
occured.

agreed nor do I expect one to occour therefore I expect the State of TN
to ignore my sexuality as I said to Dave

So now we have TWO statements in ONE 12 hour period wherein you
acknowledge that no censurable act has occured.

nope we have no such stament at all

we have Stevie lying again about what I have said

Nope. I have YOUR words. Again, YOU requoted them in this most
immediate post!

You can't even follow your own words in the attributes!

Thanks. I'll file this one too.

if the State treats me with less credibility becuase of My sexuality
then a violation would occour but I don't expect that to happen

We can wrap you in Saran Wrap, ....

no you can not

that would be assualt

"assault"

hide every religious icon, tatoo or
other mark or symbol you may wear or bear, and it won't make a
difference.

except those acts would be violating my civil rights gues you have not
heard of the 1st amendment

Oh, I've heard of it!

And Markie, in the above exchanges, the First Ammendment has
NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF THE COMMENTS.

If you're going to invoke the Bill of Rights, Markie, invoke the
RIGHT ONES!

Idiot!

Sheeeeeeeeeeesh!

You've already admitted on occassions too numerous to catalog that
you lie, do so liberally, and consider it to be a "right" and a morally
just act.

you keep omiting the full quote "in some cases"

Oh Mr Markie! Don't YOU give ME any guff about "full quotes" ! !
!

We have a billion of your "cut" and "cuting" comments throughout
RRAP!

That's all I need, Markie.

how does my lying allow you to claim Todds Father has Aids

Your LYING has ALSO included numerous occassions wherein you've
deceided to add your own "definitions". You failed to quote my
"definition" of "AIDS".

You've not been "denied" a seconds worth of "free speech" here, nor
have you been denied the vote, kept from health care (indeed I think
you are more in need than most) nor have you been impeded from one
inch's worth of unfettered travel or free movement.

never claimed any such thing

Sure you have!

nope

Oh yes you have, Markie! (More Markie Lies!) You've made
numerous rants wherein you've suggested that the exchanges herein
somehow "prevented" you from getting something you think you deserve.

Lately that "something" you THINK you deserve is "respect",
suggesting that everyone in this forum has yet to "earn" it from you!
THAT is the epitome of ARROGANCE!

Good luck proving "discrimination".

why I wasn't planing on trying to prove discrimnation (by the State of
TN) nor claiming any had occoured or was likely to occour

Three admissions of no violations or censurable acts.

three lies

Nope.

your censurable acts concern your LYING not any act of the state of TN

You've not "proved" a single one!

cut
if he lies about pumbing you can be sure I will

It get's deeper and deeper.

The liar threatening action against others for "lying":....

why not? you do

Nope.

yes you do

OK Markie...if you say so! (snickersnickergigglegiggle.....)

cut

I know dave is one of them from his words as are you

No, we're not.

yes you are both of you

More random words in search of order, Markie.

cut

Lot's of "cut" Markie.

Guess you're getting tired of stuff to get your nose rubbed in,
eh...?!?!

none presented for your either

You're the one spouting what real doctors would say. None have popped
up here to challenge my diagnosis, Colonel.

becuase you can't make one

But you claim I have, Markie!

yes I do

but I was addresing Dave

Dave can't make one

He sure did!

he isn't an LPN last time I heard therefore the standards of nursing
don't aplly to him they do apply to you

Sure they do! They "aplly" to you to!

Since you seem to be having so much fun with the Tennessee Nurse
Practice Act, I'll give you some time to find out why! It's in there!
Good luck!~

get your attributions correct

I did. YOU are confused again.

you are confusing when you lie so much and so baddly yes

"badly"

You are confused becasue YOUR lies are so interwoven and complex,
leaving your unable to keep all the stories straight.

That ONE simple fact is why you keep getting tripped up on your
own posts!

The OTHER simple fact is that your misuse and abuse of the English
language leaves you hanging out to dry!

BTW why don't you stop your lying about addresing a Colonel Dave

But YOU have refered to YOURSELF as a Colonel, Colonel.

you lying about that to?

Nope.

yep

Sheesh.

You HAVE refered to yourself as a "Colonel" As you and Brain
say..."Google provides"...

but you are lying in reffering to me as one

No...

YOU were lying in refering to yourself as one.

as to the other "charge" I am inncocent of it as a matter of law

What's "inncocent"...?!?!

As for being "guilty" of claiming that you were a Colonel, that was
proven a long time ago.

YOu continue to foul this newsgroup with your paranoid and juvenile posts.

you foul it with your bigoted lying postings

If you'll look to some of the material which appears above, you'll find
at least two lies spouted by you.

not a one Dave

Yes...Several.

nope

S E V E R A L........................

not a one

S E V E R A L.........................

As to the accusations of bigotry on
my part, deal with it.

I will of course

THAT would be a first.

nope I deal with it all the time

Obviously not.

obvioulsy how?

Obviously you have a problem "dealing" with reality. Everyone is
a "bigot" to you.

The only thing that IS "obvious" is that you misuse the word
"bigot"

I view your sexual perversity as being immoral.

what sexual perverity?

Geeze, Markie! You can't even quote a word in the very next
sentence!

but you evade the question while claerly understanding it

Markie, there was no QUESTION posed there!

another lie

"what sexual perverity?"

is a question

That's NOT what I said, Markie!

I said you couldn't even quote words correctly in the following
sentence!

As for the "QUESTION", that was the one you posed to DAVE. I was
commenting on your abusive use of the King's English.

A "question" is an interrogative, grammatically stated with the use
of a question mark at the end of it.

a lie is the willing willing stament of falsehood and you have lied in
stateing, "Markie, there was no QUESTION posed there!"

There wasn't. Not to me. FOLLOW THE ATTRIBUTES, BLOCKHEAD!

cuting stevie libel

There's no "libel".

Just you making a fool of yourself.

I've seen evidence of your frequent lying.

really you see thing that don't exist then wow prehaps help is out
there for you if you seek it

not sure if you need an Optical felow or MD or an MSSW

He needs none of the above.

I think he does

Based upon what professional credential of your own?

no need for one

Sure there is!

Otherwise YOU are "practicing medicine" without a license.

That's what YOU have been accusing ME of all week!

I think you need much the same help too

Same question.

same answer

Then you've made a NON-answer, Markie.

"Evasion"

You've shrouded yourself
in victimhood and you want a free ride in life.

another lie on your part

Nope....Tons of posts attesting to same under any one of dozen or
more screen names you've used in the last eight years.

nope more Stevie lies

Nope.

You're only deluding yourself if you think so.

you are the deluded one

Nope. We have your posts to substantiate my conclusions.

As you and Brain say, "Google provides".

where?

"www.google.com" Select "Groups", then "rec.radio.amateur.policy"

You blame all of your
numerous problems on others.

another lie Dave

Nope.

yep

Nope.

Fact.

As you and Brain like to say..."Google provides".

no

Yes.

where?

"www.google.com" Select "Groups", then
"rec.radio.amateur.policy".

Now, see if you can have me fired.

where do you work?

if it is your wosh that I try and get you fired, I am willing to help
you out, but you need to provide the name of your boss a means of
contacting him and I promise to look into it

A "promise" from you is like using a roll of toilet paper to dry up
Lake Erie.

not at all

Absolutely "at all".

nope

I have every intention of trying to get dave fired if he comfrimed that
it is his wish I do so

Uh huh.

if Dave wishes me to get him fired all he needs to do is amke it clear
that is what he wants give the means to contact his boss and I will get
to work on it

More empty threats.

another lie from Stevie

No threat at all

Dave has offered a contract if he accept the services he seem to be
requesting I will accept the deal and carry out the contract

nothing threating in offering to cary out his wishes for him (unless we
are talking about assiting him in suicide or something like that
although I don't think that should be crime, the legal system does
disagree at this time)

but we both know (i know at least I hope you do but you know I can't be
sure you do know) that Dave is talking ####

Markie, That was priceless.

cut
the same offer extend to you, if you WANT me to get you fired tell me
where you work the name of chian of supervisours and I will get to work
on it

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

I take it you decline my offer, might senible of you I must say

"sensible"

Markie, creeps like you call the hospitals EVERY DAY and try to
"get Nurse So-and-So fired" for some perceived sleight.

Your "attempts" from the UP would be dismissed just as rapidly as
the local ones are.

I can be quite generous with such things when i please

The only thing you are "generous" with, Markie, is deceit and
self-humiliation.

more stevie lies

Nope.

"Google provides"

Steve, K4YZ