RadioBanter - View Single Post - 05-235

November 16th 05, 03:23 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
Bill Sohl wrote:
Well I thnk it's time to stop waiting.
Day 7 and nothing new.

With all due respect, Bill....

Did you really expect that someone would point the way,
so that anticodetest folks could write reply comments
without having to look through all the comments?

No I doubt that Bill thinks the Procoder feel any reagrd to engage in
opne deabte we have hae in the SOP of most of the procoders here

However Bill in addresing the NG does not merely addres the ProCoder

So, answer his question!

I have

OTOH the If the ProCoders have got something new they need to shouting
it off the roof top so the FCC might hear and consider this new point

Why mention it here?

so more people might comet and bring it to the attention of the FCC

the best New point is so repceprical licenseing issues but that hardly
seems enough to turn the course (it is but a hicup issue ar best)

Logical the R&O should be by the end of the week or at worst the month

How is that "logical"?
no new arguement were entered therefore no reason to modify the R&O
from NPRM

FCC has no set deadline to produce the R&O. Given the large number of
comments, reply comments and other filings to consider, it will not be
a quick
process. Remember that FCC doesn't just have to read the comments -
they
also have to decide which arguments are most compelling, cite them, and
justify their decision.

no they do not

On top of that is the fact that while the majority of commenters
support
removing the code test for General, the majority of commenters also
support keeping the code test for Extra. So if FCC wants to remove the
code test for Extra, they have to justify ignoring what the majority
wants.

no they don't

The R&Os from FCC are carefully worded, and that sort of thing takes
a bunch of time.

However the Govt is not known for its logical behavoir

I don't think you understand "logical", Mark.

I am sure that you don't understand logic or the process of law