Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
ah I guess Dave does not like american doing their civic duty
CIVIC DUTY...?!?!?
yes civic duty
cuting stevie crying
Keep telling yourself it's "crying", Greaseball.
I "dared" to challenge one of Lennie's comments to the FCC in
EXACTLY the same manner and he went on for Y E A R S about how I
allegedly tried to challenge his "right" to seek redress from the
government! ! ! !
becuase you did
you tried to get the FCC to violate the Consititution of the US becuase
you don't like Len anderson. Personaly I am glad you did, made anything
else you tired to say all but unread
No, I did not "try to get the FCC to violate the Constitution",
Markie.
I presented some FACTS that Lennie didn't want aired.
Lennie goes one further! He actually "WARNS" the commentor about
HIS comments IN THE REPLY TO THE FCC ! ! ! ! ! !
WTF is LENNIE to "WARN" anyone...?!?! He doesn't even qualify to
be a school crossing guard!
rant away Stevie boy
What "rant", Greaseball?
Lennie DID utter a "warning" in his "reply comments".
And I reiterate my QUESTION...WTF is Lennie top "warn"
ANYone...?!?!
all you are doing is proving that you do not respect the Constitution
or the process of law
Uhhhhhhhhhhhh...yeah.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING "civic" about Lennie's intent or
comments. It was nothing but hateful bile polished by self-promoting
pontification.
showing do you don't know the meaning of the word "civic"
No...showing YOU don't know the meaning of the word "civic".
Lennie (allegedly) did his "civic" duty with his first comment to
the Commission.
Each subsequent "Reply Comment" has been one personal attack after
another.
Nothing more.
Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself
Personal attacks in a federal process is NOT "civic duty".
Nice try, Greaseball.
Steve, K4YZ
|