Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
In my comments to the Commission, I did not find it necessary to target
a single individual or group, nor did I use terms like "puffery",
"egregious" or "insulting".
That's just typical Len behavior, Dave. Check the reply comments about
ARRL, and the one about Extra Class licenses, etc.
Len can't seem to differentiate between the type of stuff he writes here
and a document he submits to the FCC.
I disagree! The difference is quite clear.
Here, Len uses emoticons and SHOUTS by using all capitals. His
submissions to FCC are full of italics, bold text, and numbered
footnotes.
Other than that, there's not much difference....
What Len fails to understand is that such carryings-on are simply
delaying the R&O.
...and may well have the result of making his comments appear less
credible to the Commission.
I remember Len referring to FCC Chairman Powell as "Mikey". As if he'd
actually address Mr. Powell that way....
Your organ grinder pal hasn't yet taken the
first baby step toward obtaining an amateur radio license in all these
many years.
Actually that's not quite true, Dave.
Some months back, Len mentioned here that he had once, way back
in the 1950s,
actually, the early 1960s
set about learning Morse Code. Claimed he'd actually
gotten up to about 6-8 wpm or so before deciding all the 'hard work'
wasn't worth it. That was just about the time 27 MHz cb came along,
and he jumped on that.
Other way around - he was on cb first.
In his own words, he just "GAVE UP".
Your point may be valid but I learned the Morse Code in the Scouts,
before I had any idea of becoming a ham. The fellow who taught it did
it right. There was no counting of dots and dashes. He linked the
letter sounds to groups of words like "here comes the bride" for "Q".
It wasn't work; it was fun. Brushing up my code a couple of years later
before taking the Novice exam wasn't any work either.
I learned it by listening to hams using Morse Code on 80 meters. I
first had
to build myself a receiver, though.
What I think happened is this: Len discovered that unlike "book
learning",
he didn't pick up on the Morse Code in a few quick lessons. For him it
took some 'hard work' to learn, and that conflicted with his view of
himself
as a 'professional in radio-electronics'. Not only that, but learning
Morse
Code would not help Len 'PROFESSIONALLY' - there was no money
reward waiting. So he gave up.
I agree.
Basically, it comes down to the fact that Len thinks he's too good to
have to learn Morse Code - or anything else - for an amateur radio
license.
He hasn't gotten into amateur radio. He isn't in amateur
radio. He will not be in amateur radio, no matter what he writes here.
Which would lead any logical person to wonder why he's so interested
in amateur radio regulations. He won't say *why* all this matters so
much to him.
He bears a long time grudge?
Sure seems that way.
After all, it's been possible to get a Technician class license without
a code test for more than 14 years. All FCC-issued amateur licenses
have been available for just a 5 wpm code test for 15 years now.
73 de Jim, N2EY