Thread
:
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
View Single Post
#
88
November 19th 05, 11:59 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
Dave Heil
Posts: n/a
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Wed 16 Nov 2005 20:30
wrote:
From: on Nov 16, 2:20 am
Dave Heil wrote:
In my comments to the Commission, I did not find it necessary to target
a single individual or group, nor did I use terms like "puffery",
"egregious" or "insulting".
Poor baby. Does Davie think that all against the code test
are equivalent to "two-year-olds refusing peas at dinner"
as Robert Rightsell did?
And once again Lennie digs in with personal attacks...Yet INSISTS
that he doesn't do such things...
I don't. Dudly the Imposter can't distinguish between STRONG
formal commentary to the federal government and his usual
"putzy" venalities she makes to others in here...
Tell us, Len, what is "STRONG formal commentary"? Does formal
commentary look like your derogatory comments toward Mr. Rightsell?
Why is it that you couldn't use the term "formal commentary"? For what
reason was the word "STRONG" used and capitalized?
The rest of us readers have been waiting impatiently for the
PROOF of Dudly's claims.
I don't think so, Leonard. There is no evidence to support your statement.
Dave K8MN
Reply With Quote