View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Old November 20th 05, 09:38 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default Regulation-by-Bandwidth Petition Filed by ARRL

nobodys old friend wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/11/15/1/?nc=1

Note how much wider the 'phone bands would become under the proposal.

73 de Jim, N2EY


Hello, Jim

Well, does this mean an SSB signal with either reduced or full carrier so I
can use a 9 KHz audio bandwidth (better than a 4.5 KHz bandwidth).
Audioooooo ...

Of course, one could use the 4.5 KHz (nice audio) bandwidth with double
sideband, full carrier, but shift the carrier 90 degrees for interesting
effects too ...

Where's my sideswiper?

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
ps - doesn't 10 meters run from 25 MHz to 32 MHz? Or something like that?


given the flaming I got over not knowing what some aphabet soup meant I
wonder what will happen to Jim for blowing that one 10 meters BTW
extends from 28MHZ to 29.7MHZ 12 meter as an aside runs from 24.890
*24.990


Stand-by for more "flaming", Mark.

I know the concept may be a bit foreign to you, but Jim hampton
was being facetious. Those who participate in "freebanding" consider
that part of the spectrum (25Mhz to 32Mhz) to be "theirs". That is the
range that many "export CB's" cover when "opened" for "freeband"
operation.

meaning jim has called the B band and the 10 meter combined with a
section above that as 10 metters amuch bigger error i sghould think
than my not knowing some alphabet soup


"B band"...?!?! I won't even venture a guess.

Your scope of awareness of present day reality of "radio policy
and practice" is far too narrow, Mark.

As for "alphabet soup", it's part of what you're supposed to know
as a Commission licensee...

No one expects you to memorize them, however you should be able to
RECOGNIZE them, realize what they are and look them up in the proper
regulation and then comply with the regulation.

but Stevie will show his double standard again


Nope. Just pointing out that you are, once again, ill-prepared to
address the subjects, Mark. You tried to "redress" Jim Hampton based
on YOUR lack of understanding, not HIS "error" for refering to it as
"10 meters".

Steve, K4YZ